YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The General Circulation and Robust Relative Humidity

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2006:;volume( 019 ):;issue: 024::page 6278
    Author:
    Sherwood, S. C.
    ,
    Meyer, C. L.
    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3979.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The sensitivity of free-tropospheric relative humidity to cloud microphysics and dynamics is explored using a simple 2D humidity model and various configurations of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3) atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM). In one configuration the imposed surface temperatures and radiative perturbations effectively eliminated the Hadley and Walker circulations and the main westerly jet, creating instead a homogeneous ?boiling kettle? world in low and midlatitudes. A similarly homogeneous state was created in the 2D model by rapid horizontal mixing. Relative humidity R simulated by the AGCM was insensitive to surface warming. Doubling a parameter governing cloud water reevaporation increased tropical mean R near the midtroposphere by about 4% with a realistic circulation, but by more than 10% in the horizontally homogeneous states. This was consistent in both models. AGCM microphysical sensitivity decreased in the upper troposphere, and vanished outside the Tropics. Convective organization by the general circulation evidently makes relative humidity much more robust to microphysical details by concentrating the rainfall in moist environments. Models that fail to capture this will overestimate the microphysical sensitivity of humidity. Based on these results, the uncertainty in the strength of the water vapor feedback associated with cloud microphysical processes seems unlikely to exceed a few percent. This does not include uncertainties associated with large-scale dynamics or cloud radiative effects, which cannot be quantified, although radical CAM3 circulation changes reported here had surprisingly little impact on simulated relative humidity.
    • Download: (1.284Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The General Circulation and Robust Relative Humidity

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4221112
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSherwood, S. C.
    contributor authorMeyer, C. L.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:02:39Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:02:39Z
    date copyright2006/12/01
    date issued2006
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-78442.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4221112
    description abstractThe sensitivity of free-tropospheric relative humidity to cloud microphysics and dynamics is explored using a simple 2D humidity model and various configurations of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3) atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM). In one configuration the imposed surface temperatures and radiative perturbations effectively eliminated the Hadley and Walker circulations and the main westerly jet, creating instead a homogeneous ?boiling kettle? world in low and midlatitudes. A similarly homogeneous state was created in the 2D model by rapid horizontal mixing. Relative humidity R simulated by the AGCM was insensitive to surface warming. Doubling a parameter governing cloud water reevaporation increased tropical mean R near the midtroposphere by about 4% with a realistic circulation, but by more than 10% in the horizontally homogeneous states. This was consistent in both models. AGCM microphysical sensitivity decreased in the upper troposphere, and vanished outside the Tropics. Convective organization by the general circulation evidently makes relative humidity much more robust to microphysical details by concentrating the rainfall in moist environments. Models that fail to capture this will overestimate the microphysical sensitivity of humidity. Based on these results, the uncertainty in the strength of the water vapor feedback associated with cloud microphysical processes seems unlikely to exceed a few percent. This does not include uncertainties associated with large-scale dynamics or cloud radiative effects, which cannot be quantified, although radical CAM3 circulation changes reported here had surprisingly little impact on simulated relative humidity.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe General Circulation and Robust Relative Humidity
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume19
    journal issue24
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/JCLI3979.1
    journal fristpage6278
    journal lastpage6290
    treeJournal of Climate:;2006:;volume( 019 ):;issue: 024
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian