The Simulation of Moisture Processes in Climate Models and Climate Sensitivity

Abstract

General circulation models (GCMs) designed for projecting climatic change have exhibited a wide range of sensitivity. Therefore, projected surface warming with increasing CO2 varies considerably depending on which model is used. Despite notable advances in computing power and modeling techniques that have occurred over the past decade, uncertainties of model sensitivity have not been reduced accordingly. The sensitivity issue is investigated by examining two GCMs of very different modeling techniques and sensitivity, with attention focused on how moisture processes are treated in these models, how moisture simulations are affected by these processes, and how well these simulations compare to the observed and analyzed moisture field. Both GCMs predict increases of atmospheric moisture with doubled CO2, but the increment predicted by one model is substantially higher (approximately twice) than that predicted by the other. This same difference is seen in responses of the boundary layer diffusive moistening rate. Calculations with a radiative?convective model indicate that the differences in predicted equilibrium atmospheric moisture, including both column amount and vertical distribution, have contributed to the largest differences in model sensitivity between the two models. We argue that in order for climate models to be credible for prediction purposes, they must possess credible skills of simulating surface and boundary layer processes, which likely holds the key to overall moisture performance, its response to external forcing, and in turn to model sensitivity.