YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sequential Factor Separation for the Analysis of Numerical Model Simulations

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2017:;Volume( 074 ):;issue: 005::page 1471
    Author:
    Schär, Christoph
    ,
    Kröner, Nico
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0284.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: odels are attractive tools to deepen the understanding of atmospheric and climate processes. In practice, such investigations often involve numerical experiments that switch on or off individual factors (such as latent heating, nonlinear coupling, or some climate forcing). However, as in general many factors can be considered, the analysis of these experiments is far from straightforward. In particular, as pointed out in an influential study on factor separation by Stein and Alpert, the analysis will often require the consideration of nonlinear interaction terms.In the current paper an alternative factor separation methodology is proposed and analyzed. Unlike the classical method, sequential factor separation (SFS) does not involve the derivation of the interaction terms but, rather, provides some uncertainty measure that addresses the quality of the separation. The main advantage of the proposed methodology is that in the case of n factors it merely requires 2n simulations (rather than 2n for the classical analysis). The paper provides an outline of the methodology, a detailed mathematical analysis, and a theoretical intercomparison against the classical methodology. In addition, an example and an intercomparison using regional climate model experiments with n = 3 factors are presented. The results relate to the Mediterranean amplification and demonstrate that?at least in the particular example considered?the two methodologies yield almost identical results and that the SFS is rather insensitive with respect to design choices.
    • Download: (2.465Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Sequential Factor Separation for the Analysis of Numerical Model Simulations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4220226
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSchär, Christoph
    contributor authorKröner, Nico
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:59:55Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:59:55Z
    date copyright2017/05/01
    date issued2017
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-77645.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4220226
    description abstractodels are attractive tools to deepen the understanding of atmospheric and climate processes. In practice, such investigations often involve numerical experiments that switch on or off individual factors (such as latent heating, nonlinear coupling, or some climate forcing). However, as in general many factors can be considered, the analysis of these experiments is far from straightforward. In particular, as pointed out in an influential study on factor separation by Stein and Alpert, the analysis will often require the consideration of nonlinear interaction terms.In the current paper an alternative factor separation methodology is proposed and analyzed. Unlike the classical method, sequential factor separation (SFS) does not involve the derivation of the interaction terms but, rather, provides some uncertainty measure that addresses the quality of the separation. The main advantage of the proposed methodology is that in the case of n factors it merely requires 2n simulations (rather than 2n for the classical analysis). The paper provides an outline of the methodology, a detailed mathematical analysis, and a theoretical intercomparison against the classical methodology. In addition, an example and an intercomparison using regional climate model experiments with n = 3 factors are presented. The results relate to the Mediterranean amplification and demonstrate that?at least in the particular example considered?the two methodologies yield almost identical results and that the SFS is rather insensitive with respect to design choices.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSequential Factor Separation for the Analysis of Numerical Model Simulations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume74
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-16-0284.1
    journal fristpage1471
    journal lastpage1484
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2017:;Volume( 074 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian