YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Are Sudden Stratospheric Warmings Generic? Insights from an Idealized GCM

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2016:;Volume( 073 ):;issue: 012::page 5061
    Author:
    Jucker, Martin
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0353.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: his work examines the life cycle of sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) from composites of a large number of events. The events are sampled from idealized general circulation model (GCM) integrations and form a database of several hundred major, displacement, splitting, and weak vortex events. It is shown that except for a few details, the generic zonal-mean evolution does not depend on the definition used to detect SSWs. In all cases, the composites show the stratosphere in a positive annular mode phase prior to the events and a barotropic response in the stratosphere at onset. There is a clear positive peak in upward Eliassen?Palm (EP) flux prior to the onset date in the stratosphere and a much weaker peak in the troposphere, making the evolution more consistent with the picture of the stratosphere acting as a variable filter of tropospheric EP flux, rather than SSWs being forced by a strong ?burst? in the troposphere. When comparing composites of SSWs from the database with apparent influence at the surface (downward ?propagating?) to those without such influence, the only significant differences are a somewhat more barotropic response at the onset date and longer persistence in the lower stratosphere after the onset for propagating SSWs. There is no significant difference in EP flux between propagating and nonpropagating events, and none of the definitions considered here shows a particular skill in selecting propagating events.
    • Download: (2.339Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Are Sudden Stratospheric Warmings Generic? Insights from an Idealized GCM

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4220086
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJucker, Martin
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:59:23Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:59:23Z
    date copyright2016/12/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-77519.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4220086
    description abstracthis work examines the life cycle of sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) from composites of a large number of events. The events are sampled from idealized general circulation model (GCM) integrations and form a database of several hundred major, displacement, splitting, and weak vortex events. It is shown that except for a few details, the generic zonal-mean evolution does not depend on the definition used to detect SSWs. In all cases, the composites show the stratosphere in a positive annular mode phase prior to the events and a barotropic response in the stratosphere at onset. There is a clear positive peak in upward Eliassen?Palm (EP) flux prior to the onset date in the stratosphere and a much weaker peak in the troposphere, making the evolution more consistent with the picture of the stratosphere acting as a variable filter of tropospheric EP flux, rather than SSWs being forced by a strong ?burst? in the troposphere. When comparing composites of SSWs from the database with apparent influence at the surface (downward ?propagating?) to those without such influence, the only significant differences are a somewhat more barotropic response at the onset date and longer persistence in the lower stratosphere after the onset for propagating SSWs. There is no significant difference in EP flux between propagating and nonpropagating events, and none of the definitions considered here shows a particular skill in selecting propagating events.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAre Sudden Stratospheric Warmings Generic? Insights from an Idealized GCM
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume73
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-15-0353.1
    journal fristpage5061
    journal lastpage5080
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2016:;Volume( 073 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian