| description abstract | ven though ice formation mechanisms in clouds probably obey all the same thermodynamic principles, the associated mechanical and thermal energy transfers differ with respect to the exact pathway and the associated phases. Consequently, heterogeneous ice nucleation parameterizations play an important role in cloud modeling.The 1.5D bin-resolved microphysics Detailed Scavenging Model (DESCAM) was used to assess the role of the parameterizations for different ice initiation processes. Homogeneous nucleation, deposition freezing, contact freezing, immersion freezing, and condensation freezing were treated explicitly, and their impacts alone and in competition with each other on cloud microphysics and precipitation were studied. The role of efficiently ice-nucleating bacteria on cloud evolution was addressed, as well as means to consider different chemical natures of ice nucleation particles.For the conditions studied, it was found that deposition and contact freezing only played a negligible role with respect to the other ice-nucleating mechanisms. Homogeneous freezing and classical immersion freezing showed a similar behavior. Both freezing rates increase with increasing drop age (i.e., size). This suggests a possibility for regrouping processes in future parameterized cloud models. Condensation freezing parameterization, however, acts at much warmer temperatures in clouds and for much smaller drops. The associated release of latent heat at lower altitudes caused significantly different cloud dynamics with respect to homogeneous/immersion freezing. This suggests that, in future parameterized models, the condensation freezing process needs particular attention, as well as the fact that ice-forming nuclei (IN) are a subset of aerosol particles that are depleted and replenished like the rest of the population. | |
