YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Formal Analysis of the Feedback Concept in Climate Models. Part III: Feedback Dynamics and the Seasonal Cycle in a Floquet Analysis

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2015:;Volume( 072 ):;issue: 009::page 3574
    Author:
    Lahellec, Alain
    ,
    Reimer, Krista
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0364.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: his article introduces a new decomposition of climate feedback mechanisms based on their characteristic times. As the last of a series of three, it complements the first two parts by Lahellec and Dufresne to give a comprehensive review of climate feedbacks that will help to ensure consistency between practice and theory. In Parts I and II, analysis of the climate response to perturbations at the large spatial scales and time scales necessary to obtain linearity restricted the characterization to the slow components of the response. This part incorporates the fast mechanisms? impact on the climate feedbacks, bringing the seasonal cycle into the analysis. Thanks to the Floquet theory, the authors could extend the formal framework of Parts I and II to incorporate the fast mechanisms. An illustration of the formal results with a simple 1D model highlights a clear distinction between the role of fast (intraseasonal) and slow (decadal) feedbacks, with an application to the water-cycle feedback of Part II. The same implementation of the Gâteaux difference in LMDZ, the GCM of LMD, as in Part II is used for comparing results with the authors? toy model. This comparison essentially validates the Floquet decomposition obtained with the toy model: the fast component linked to precipitation is contributing negatively to the water-cycle feedback while the slow component is building up the positive feedback. The comparison also provides further insight on the sensitivity of models? precipitation to climate warming.
    • Download: (1.791Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Formal Analysis of the Feedback Concept in Climate Models. Part III: Feedback Dynamics and the Seasonal Cycle in a Floquet Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4219785
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLahellec, Alain
    contributor authorReimer, Krista
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:58:15Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:58:15Z
    date copyright2015/09/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-77248.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4219785
    description abstracthis article introduces a new decomposition of climate feedback mechanisms based on their characteristic times. As the last of a series of three, it complements the first two parts by Lahellec and Dufresne to give a comprehensive review of climate feedbacks that will help to ensure consistency between practice and theory. In Parts I and II, analysis of the climate response to perturbations at the large spatial scales and time scales necessary to obtain linearity restricted the characterization to the slow components of the response. This part incorporates the fast mechanisms? impact on the climate feedbacks, bringing the seasonal cycle into the analysis. Thanks to the Floquet theory, the authors could extend the formal framework of Parts I and II to incorporate the fast mechanisms. An illustration of the formal results with a simple 1D model highlights a clear distinction between the role of fast (intraseasonal) and slow (decadal) feedbacks, with an application to the water-cycle feedback of Part II. The same implementation of the Gâteaux difference in LMDZ, the GCM of LMD, as in Part II is used for comparing results with the authors? toy model. This comparison essentially validates the Floquet decomposition obtained with the toy model: the fast component linked to precipitation is contributing negatively to the water-cycle feedback while the slow component is building up the positive feedback. The comparison also provides further insight on the sensitivity of models? precipitation to climate warming.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Formal Analysis of the Feedback Concept in Climate Models. Part III: Feedback Dynamics and the Seasonal Cycle in a Floquet Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume72
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-14-0364.1
    journal fristpage3574
    journal lastpage3596
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2015:;Volume( 072 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian