YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Validation of Large-Eddy Simulation Methods for Gravity Wave Breaking

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2015:;Volume( 072 ):;issue: 009::page 3537
    Author:
    Remmler, Sebastian
    ,
    Hickel, Stefan
    ,
    Fruman, Mark D.
    ,
    Achatz, Ulrich
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0321.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: To reduce the computational costs of numerical studies of gravity wave breaking in the atmosphere, the grid resolution has to be reduced as much as possible. Insufficient resolution of small-scale turbulence demands a proper turbulence parameterization in the framework of a large-eddy simulation (LES). The authors validate three different LES methods?the adaptive local deconvolution method (ALDM), the dynamic Smagorinsky method (DSM), and a naïve central discretization without turbulence parameterization (CDS4)?for three different cases of the breaking of well-defined monochromatic gravity waves. For ALDM, a modification of the numerical flux functions is developed that significantly improves the simulation results in the case of a temporarily very smooth velocity field. The test cases include an unstable and a stable inertia?gravity wave as well as an unstable high-frequency gravity wave. All simulations are carried out both in three-dimensional domains and in two-dimensional domains in which the velocity and vorticity fields are three-dimensional (so-called 2.5D simulations). The results obtained with ALDM and DSM are generally in good agreement with the reference direct numerical simulations as long as the resolution in the direction of the wave vector is sufficiently high. The resolution in the other directions has a weaker influence on the results. The simulations without turbulence parameterization are only successful if the resolution is high and the level of turbulence is comparatively low.
    • Download: (3.161Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Validation of Large-Eddy Simulation Methods for Gravity Wave Breaking

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4219748
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRemmler, Sebastian
    contributor authorHickel, Stefan
    contributor authorFruman, Mark D.
    contributor authorAchatz, Ulrich
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:58:06Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:58:06Z
    date copyright2015/09/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-77214.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4219748
    description abstractTo reduce the computational costs of numerical studies of gravity wave breaking in the atmosphere, the grid resolution has to be reduced as much as possible. Insufficient resolution of small-scale turbulence demands a proper turbulence parameterization in the framework of a large-eddy simulation (LES). The authors validate three different LES methods?the adaptive local deconvolution method (ALDM), the dynamic Smagorinsky method (DSM), and a naïve central discretization without turbulence parameterization (CDS4)?for three different cases of the breaking of well-defined monochromatic gravity waves. For ALDM, a modification of the numerical flux functions is developed that significantly improves the simulation results in the case of a temporarily very smooth velocity field. The test cases include an unstable and a stable inertia?gravity wave as well as an unstable high-frequency gravity wave. All simulations are carried out both in three-dimensional domains and in two-dimensional domains in which the velocity and vorticity fields are three-dimensional (so-called 2.5D simulations). The results obtained with ALDM and DSM are generally in good agreement with the reference direct numerical simulations as long as the resolution in the direction of the wave vector is sufficiently high. The resolution in the other directions has a weaker influence on the results. The simulations without turbulence parameterization are only successful if the resolution is high and the level of turbulence is comparatively low.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleValidation of Large-Eddy Simulation Methods for Gravity Wave Breaking
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume72
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS-D-14-0321.1
    journal fristpage3537
    journal lastpage3562
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2015:;Volume( 072 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian