YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Interpreting the Opposition between Two Block-Onset Forcing Mechanisms

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2007:;Volume( 064 ):;issue: 006::page 2091
    Author:
    Dong, Li
    ,
    Colucci, Stephen J.
    DOI: 10.1175/JAS3936.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The opposition between two block-onset forcing mechanisms, previously identified in midtropospheric analyses over the Southern Hemisphere midlatitudes, is analytically interpreted with an idealized model. These mechanisms are the interaction (Finter) between deformation and potential vorticity and the advection (Fadv) of meridionally varying potential vorticity. Weather systems of concern, primarily consisting of planetary- and synoptic-scale waves, mostly fall into two regimes of zonal and meridional wavenumber space in which the opposition between the two block-onset forcing mechanisms is analytically derived. A synoptic interpretation of this opposition is schematically presented within the framework of barotropic dynamics. It is found that whether blocking occurs in diffluent or confluent flow depends upon the critical wavelength associated with the geostrophic flow. Blocking tends to take place in the diffluent flow of long waves in which Finter dominates over Fadv. In addition, blocking also tends to occur in the confluent flow of relative short waves in which Fadv prevails over Finter. An investigation of Rossby wave phase speeds in one diagnosed case reveals a lengthening with time of the dominant wave until it reaches the stationary wavelength on the block-onset day. In this context blocking may be understood as a stationarity and thus persistence of one of the two block-onset forcing mechanisms.
    • Download: (2.543Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Interpreting the Opposition between Two Block-Onset Forcing Mechanisms

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4218531
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDong, Li
    contributor authorColucci, Stephen J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:53:43Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:53:43Z
    date copyright2007/06/01
    date issued2007
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-76119.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4218531
    description abstractThe opposition between two block-onset forcing mechanisms, previously identified in midtropospheric analyses over the Southern Hemisphere midlatitudes, is analytically interpreted with an idealized model. These mechanisms are the interaction (Finter) between deformation and potential vorticity and the advection (Fadv) of meridionally varying potential vorticity. Weather systems of concern, primarily consisting of planetary- and synoptic-scale waves, mostly fall into two regimes of zonal and meridional wavenumber space in which the opposition between the two block-onset forcing mechanisms is analytically derived. A synoptic interpretation of this opposition is schematically presented within the framework of barotropic dynamics. It is found that whether blocking occurs in diffluent or confluent flow depends upon the critical wavelength associated with the geostrophic flow. Blocking tends to take place in the diffluent flow of long waves in which Finter dominates over Fadv. In addition, blocking also tends to occur in the confluent flow of relative short waves in which Fadv prevails over Finter. An investigation of Rossby wave phase speeds in one diagnosed case reveals a lengthening with time of the dominant wave until it reaches the stationary wavelength on the block-onset day. In this context blocking may be understood as a stationarity and thus persistence of one of the two block-onset forcing mechanisms.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleInterpreting the Opposition between Two Block-Onset Forcing Mechanisms
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume64
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/JAS3936.1
    journal fristpage2091
    journal lastpage2104
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2007:;Volume( 064 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian