| description abstract | he feature-based spatial verification method named for its three score components: structure, amplitude, and location (SAL) is applied to cloud data, that is, two-dimensional spatial fields of total cloud cover and spectral radiance. Model output is obtained from the German-focused Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling (COSMO-DE) forward operator Synthetic Satellite Simulator (SynSat) and compared with SEVIRI satellite data. The aim of this study is twofold: first, to assess the applicability of SAL to this kind of data and, second, to analyze the role of external object identification algorithms (OIA) and the effects of observational uncertainties on the resulting scores. A comparison of three different OIA shows that the threshold level, which is a fundamental part of all studied algorithms, induces high sensitivity and unstable behavior of object-dependent SAL scores (i.e., even very small changes in parameter values lead to large changes in the resulting scores). An in-depth statistical analysis reveals significant effects on distributional quantities commonly used in the interpretation of SAL, for example, median and interquartile distance. Two sensitivity indicators that are based on the univariate cumulative distribution functions are derived. They make it possible to assess the sensitivity of the SAL scores to threshold-level changes without computationally expensive iterative calculations of SAL for various thresholds. The mathematical structure of these indicators connects the sensitivity of the SAL scores to parameter changes with the effect of observational uncertainties. Last, the discriminating power of SAL is studied. It is shown that?for large-scale cloud data?changes in the parameters may have larger effects on the object-dependent SAL scores (i.e., the S and L2 scores) than does a complete loss of temporal collocation. | |
