Show simple item record

contributor authorReen, Brian P.
contributor authorSchmehl, Kerrie J.
contributor authorYoung, George S.
contributor authorLee, Jared A.
contributor authorHaupt, Sue Ellen
contributor authorStauffer, David R.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:49:55Z
date available2017-06-09T16:49:55Z
date copyright2014/11/01
date issued2014
identifier issn1558-8424
identifier otherams-74931.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217210
description abstracthe relationship between atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) depth uncertainty and uncertainty in atmospheric transport and dispersion (ATD) simulations is investigated by examining profiles of predicted concentrations of a contaminant. Because ensembles are an important method for quantifying uncertainty in ATD simulations, this work focuses on the utilization and analysis of ensemble members? ABL structures for ATD simulations. A 12-member physics ensemble of meteorological model simulations drives a 12-member explicit ensemble of ATD simulations. The relationship between ABL depth and plume depth is investigated using ensemble members, which vary both the relevant model physics and the numerical methods used to diagnose ABL depth. New analysis methods are used to analyze ensemble output within an ABL-depth relative framework. Uncertainty due to ABL depth calculation methodology is investigated via a four-member mini-ensemble. When subjected to a continuous tracer release, concentration variability among the ensemble members is largest near the ABL top during the daytime, apparently because of uncertainty in ABL depth. This persists to the second day of the simulation for the 4-member diagnosis mini-ensemble, which varies only the ABL depth, but for the 12-member physics ensemble the concentration variability is large throughout the daytime ABL. This suggests that the increased within-ABL concentration variability on the second day is due to larger differences among the ensemble members? predicted meteorological conditions rather than being solely due to differences in the ABL depth diagnosis methods. This work demonstrates new analysis methods for the relationship between ABL depth and plume depth within an ensemble framework and provides motivation for directly including ABL depth uncertainty from a meteorological model into an ATD model.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleUncertainty in Contaminant Concentration Fields Resulting from Atmospheric Boundary Layer Depth Uncertainty
typeJournal Paper
journal volume53
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
identifier doi10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0262.1
journal fristpage2610
journal lastpage2626
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2014:;volume( 053 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record