Show simple item record

contributor authorHegarty, Jennifer
contributor authorDraxler, Roland R.
contributor authorStein, Ariel F.
contributor authorBrioude, Jerome
contributor authorMountain, Marikate
contributor authorEluszkiewicz, Janusz
contributor authorNehrkorn, Thomas
contributor authorNgan, Fong
contributor authorAndrews, Arlyn
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:49:45Z
date available2017-06-09T16:49:45Z
date copyright2013/12/01
date issued2013
identifier issn1558-8424
identifier otherams-74869.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217141
description abstracthree widely used Lagrangian particle dispersion models (LPDMs)?the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT), Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT), and Flexible Particle (FLEXPART) models?are evaluated with measurements from the controlled tracer-release experiments Cross-Appalachian Tracer Experiment (CAPTEX) and Across North America Tracer Experiment (ANATEX). The LPDMs are run forward in time driven by identical meteorological inputs from the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) and several configurations of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, and the simulations of tracer concentrations are evaluated against the measurements with a ranking procedure derived from the combination of four statistical parameters. The statistical evaluation reveals that all three LPDMs have comparable skill in simulating the tracer plumes when driven by the same meteorological inputs, indicating that the differences in their formulations play a secondary role. Simulations with HYSPLIT and STILT demonstrate the benefit of using customized hourly WRF fields with 10-km horizontal grid spacing over the use of 3-hourly NARR fields with 32-km horizontal grid spacing. All three LPDMs perform better when the WRF wind fields in the planetary boundary layer are nudged to NARR, with FLEXPART benefitting the most. Case studies indicate that the nudging corrects an overestimate in plume transport speed possibly caused by a positive bias in WRF wind speeds near the surface. All three LPDMs also benefit from the use of time-averaged velocity and convective mass flux fields generated by WRF, but the impact on HYSPLIT and STILT is much greater than on FLEXPART. STILT backward runs perform as well as their forward counterparts, demonstrating this model?s reversibility and its suitability for application to inverse flux estimates.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleEvaluation of Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Models with Measurements from Controlled Tracer Releases
typeJournal Paper
journal volume52
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
identifier doi10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0125.1
journal fristpage2623
journal lastpage2637
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2013:;volume( 052 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record