Show simple item record

contributor authorDrobinski, Philippe
contributor authorKarbou, Fatima
contributor authorBauer, Peter
contributor authorCocquerez, Philippe
contributor authorLavaysse, Christophe
contributor authorHock, Terry
contributor authorParsons, David
contributor authorRabier, Florence
contributor authorRedelsperger, Jean-Luc
contributor authorVénel, Stéphanie
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:48:43Z
date available2017-06-09T16:48:43Z
date copyright2013/04/01
date issued2012
identifier issn1558-8424
identifier otherams-74572.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4216812
description abstracturing the international African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) project, stratospheric balloons carrying gondolas called driftsondes capable of dropping meteorological sondes were deployed over West Africa and the tropical Atlantic Ocean. The goals of the deployment were to test the technology and to study the African easterly waves, which are often the forerunners of hurricanes. Between 29 August and 22 September 2006, 124 sondes were dropped over the seven easterly waves that moved across Africa into the Atlantic between about 10° and 20°N, where almost no in situ vertical information exists. Conditions included waves that developed into Tropical Storm Florence and Hurricanes Gordon and Helene. In this study, a selection of numerical weather prediction model outputs has been compared with the dropsondes to assess the effect of some developments in data assimilation on the quality of analyses and forecasts. By comparing two different versions of the Action de Recherche Petite Echelle Grande Echelle (ARPEGE) model of Météo-France with the dropsondes, first the benefits of the last data assimilation updates are quantified. Then comparisons are carried out using the ARPEGE model and the Integrated Forecast System (IFS) model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. It is shown that the two models represent very well the vertical structure of temperature and humidity over both land and sea, and particularly within the Saharan air layer, which displays humidity below 5%?10%. Conversely, the models are less able to represent the vertical structure of the meridional wind. This problem seems to be common to ARPEGE and IFS, and its understanding still requires further investigations.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleDriftsonde Observations to Evaluate Numerical Weather Prediction of the Late 2006 African Monsoon
typeJournal Paper
journal volume52
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
identifier doi10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0176.1
journal fristpage974
journal lastpage995
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2012:;volume( 052 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record