Show simple item record

contributor authorStraka, Jerry M.
contributor authorKanak, Katharine M.
contributor authorGilmore, Matthew S.
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:48:18Z
date available2017-06-09T16:48:18Z
date copyright2007/08/01
date issued2007
identifier issn1558-8424
identifier otherams-74455.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4216682
description abstractThis paper presents a mathematical explanation for the nonconservation of total number concentration Nt of hydrometeors for the continuous collection growth process, for which Nt physically should be conserved for selected one- and two-moment bulk parameterization schemes. Where possible, physical explanations are proposed. The assumption of a constant no in scheme A is physically inconsistent with the continuous collection growth process, as is the assumption of a constant Dn for scheme B. Scheme E also is nonconservative, but it seems this result is not because of a physically inconsistent specification; rather the solution scheme?s equations simply do not satisfy Nt conservation and Nt does not come into the derivation. Even scheme F, which perfectly conserves Nt, does not preserve the distribution shape in comparison with a bin model.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleThe Behavior of Number Concentration Tendencies for the Continuous Collection Growth Equation Using One- and Two-Moment Bulk Parameterization Schemes
typeJournal Paper
journal volume46
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
identifier doi10.1175/JAM2527.1
journal fristpage1264
journal lastpage1274
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2007:;volume( 046 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record