Variability of Drop Size Distributions: Time-Scale Dependence of the Variability and Its Effects on Rain EstimationSource: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;2005:;volume( 044 ):;issue: 002::page 241DOI: 10.1175/JAM2183.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: A systematic and intensive analysis is performed on 5 yr of reliable disdrometric data (over 20 000 one-minute drop size distributions, DSDs) to investigate the variability of DSDs in the Montreal, Quebec, Canada, area. The scale dependence (climatological scale, day to day, within a day, between physical processes, and within a physical process) of the DSD variability and its effect on rainfall intensity R estimation from radar reflectivity Z are explored in terms of bias and random errors. Detail error distributions are also provided. The use of a climatological R?Z relationship for rainfall?affected by all of the DSDs? variability?leads on average to a random error of 41% in instantaneous rain-rate estimation. This error decreases with integration time, but the decrease becomes less pronounced for integration times longer than 2 h. Daily accumulations computed with the climatological R?Z relationship have a bias of 28% because of the day-to-day DSD variability. However, when daily R?Z relationships are used, a random error of 32% in instantaneous rain rate is still present because of the DSD variability within a day. This illustrates that most of the variability of DSDs has its origin within a storm or between storms within a day. Physical processes leading to the formation of DSDs are then classified according to the vertical structure of radar data as measured by a UHF profiler collocated with the disdrometer. The DSD variability among different physical processes is larger than the day-to-day variability. A bias of 41% in rain accumulations is due to the DSD variability between physical processes. Accurate rain-rate estimation (?7%) can be achieved only after the proper underlying physical process is identified and the associated R?Z relationship is used.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Lee, Gyu Won | |
| contributor author | Zawadzki, Isztar | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:47:23Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T16:47:23Z | |
| date copyright | 2005/02/01 | |
| date issued | 2005 | |
| identifier issn | 0894-8763 | |
| identifier other | ams-74119.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4216309 | |
| description abstract | A systematic and intensive analysis is performed on 5 yr of reliable disdrometric data (over 20 000 one-minute drop size distributions, DSDs) to investigate the variability of DSDs in the Montreal, Quebec, Canada, area. The scale dependence (climatological scale, day to day, within a day, between physical processes, and within a physical process) of the DSD variability and its effect on rainfall intensity R estimation from radar reflectivity Z are explored in terms of bias and random errors. Detail error distributions are also provided. The use of a climatological R?Z relationship for rainfall?affected by all of the DSDs? variability?leads on average to a random error of 41% in instantaneous rain-rate estimation. This error decreases with integration time, but the decrease becomes less pronounced for integration times longer than 2 h. Daily accumulations computed with the climatological R?Z relationship have a bias of 28% because of the day-to-day DSD variability. However, when daily R?Z relationships are used, a random error of 32% in instantaneous rain rate is still present because of the DSD variability within a day. This illustrates that most of the variability of DSDs has its origin within a storm or between storms within a day. Physical processes leading to the formation of DSDs are then classified according to the vertical structure of radar data as measured by a UHF profiler collocated with the disdrometer. The DSD variability among different physical processes is larger than the day-to-day variability. A bias of 41% in rain accumulations is due to the DSD variability between physical processes. Accurate rain-rate estimation (?7%) can be achieved only after the proper underlying physical process is identified and the associated R?Z relationship is used. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Variability of Drop Size Distributions: Time-Scale Dependence of the Variability and Its Effects on Rain Estimation | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 44 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Applied Meteorology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/JAM2183.1 | |
| journal fristpage | 241 | |
| journal lastpage | 255 | |
| tree | Journal of Applied Meteorology:;2005:;volume( 044 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |