Show simple item record

contributor authorHegerl, Gabriele C.
contributor authorBlack, Emily
contributor authorAllan, Richard P.
contributor authorIngram, William J.
contributor authorPolson, Debbie
contributor authorTrenberth, Kevin E.
contributor authorChadwick, Robin S.
contributor authorArkin, Phillip A.
contributor authorSarojini, Beena Balan
contributor authorBecker, Andreas
contributor authorDai, Aiguo
contributor authorDurack, Paul J.
contributor authorEasterling, David
contributor authorFowler, Hayley J.
contributor authorKendon, Elizabeth J.
contributor authorHuffman, George J.
contributor authorLiu, Chunlei
contributor authorMarsh, Robert
contributor authorNew, Mark
contributor authorOsborn, Timothy J.
contributor authorSkliris, Nikolaos
contributor authorStott, Peter A.
contributor authorVidale, Pier-Luigi
contributor authorWijffels, Susan E.
contributor authorWilcox, Laura J.
contributor authorWillett, Kate M.
contributor authorZhang, Xuebin
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:45:12Z
date available2017-06-09T16:45:12Z
date copyright2015/07/01
date issued2014
identifier issn0003-0007
identifier otherams-73489.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4215608
description abstractnderstanding observed changes to the global water cycle is key to predicting future climate changes and their impacts. While many datasets document crucial variables such as precipitation, ocean salinity, runoff, and humidity, most are uncertain for determining long-term changes. In situ networks provide long time series over land, but are sparse in many regions, particularly the tropics. Satellite and reanalysis datasets provide global coverage, but their long-term stability is lacking. However, comparisons of changes among related variables can give insights into the robustness of observed changes. For example, ocean salinity, interpreted with an understanding of ocean processes, can help cross-validate precipitation. Observational evidence for human influences on the water cycle is emerging, but uncertainties resulting from internal variability and observational errors are too large to determine whether the observed and simulated changes are consistent. Improvements to the in situ and satellite observing networks that monitor the changing water cycle are required, yet continued data coverage is threatened by funding reductions. Uncertainty both in the role of anthropogenic aerosols and because of the large climate variability presently limits confidence in attribution of observed changes.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleChallenges in Quantifying Changes in the Global Water Cycle
typeJournal Paper
journal volume96
journal issue7
journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
identifier doi10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00212.1
journal fristpage1097
journal lastpage1115
treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2014:;volume( 096 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record