YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Is Tropical Cyclone Intensity Guidance Improving?

    Source: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2013:;volume( 095 ):;issue: 003::page 387
    Author:
    DeMaria, Mark
    ,
    Sampson, Charles R.
    ,
    Knaff, John A.
    ,
    Musgrave, Kate D.
    DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00240.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: absolute error of the official tropical cyclone (TC) intensity forecasts from the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) shows limited evidence of improvement over the past two decades. This result has sometimes erroneously been used to conclude that little or no progress has been made in the TC intensity guidance models. This article documents statistically significant improvements in operational TC intensity guidance over the past 24 years (1989?2012) in four tropical cyclone basins (Atlantic, eastern North Pacific, western North Pacific, and Southern Hemisphere). Errors from the best available model have decreased at 1%?2% yr?1 at 24?72 h, with faster improvement rates at 96 and 120 h. Although these rates are only about one-third to one-half of the rates of reduction of the track forecast models, most are statistically significant at the 95% level. These error reductions resulted from improvements in statistical?dynamical intensity models and consensus techniques that combine information from statistical?dynamical and dynamical models. The reason that the official NHC and JTWC intensity forecast errors have decreased slower than the guidance errors is because in the first half of the analyzed period, their subjective forecasts were more accurate than any of the available guidance. It is only in the last decade that the objective intensity guidance has become accurate enough to influence the NHC and JTWC forecast errors.
    • Download: (713.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Is Tropical Cyclone Intensity Guidance Improving?

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4215483
    Collections
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDeMaria, Mark
    contributor authorSampson, Charles R.
    contributor authorKnaff, John A.
    contributor authorMusgrave, Kate D.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:44:47Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:44:47Z
    date copyright2014/03/01
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0003-0007
    identifier otherams-73376.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4215483
    description abstractabsolute error of the official tropical cyclone (TC) intensity forecasts from the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) shows limited evidence of improvement over the past two decades. This result has sometimes erroneously been used to conclude that little or no progress has been made in the TC intensity guidance models. This article documents statistically significant improvements in operational TC intensity guidance over the past 24 years (1989?2012) in four tropical cyclone basins (Atlantic, eastern North Pacific, western North Pacific, and Southern Hemisphere). Errors from the best available model have decreased at 1%?2% yr?1 at 24?72 h, with faster improvement rates at 96 and 120 h. Although these rates are only about one-third to one-half of the rates of reduction of the track forecast models, most are statistically significant at the 95% level. These error reductions resulted from improvements in statistical?dynamical intensity models and consensus techniques that combine information from statistical?dynamical and dynamical models. The reason that the official NHC and JTWC intensity forecast errors have decreased slower than the guidance errors is because in the first half of the analyzed period, their subjective forecasts were more accurate than any of the available guidance. It is only in the last decade that the objective intensity guidance has become accurate enough to influence the NHC and JTWC forecast errors.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleIs Tropical Cyclone Intensity Guidance Improving?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume95
    journal issue3
    journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    identifier doi10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00240.1
    journal fristpage387
    journal lastpage398
    treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2013:;volume( 095 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian