YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Review of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts and Their Use in Short- to Medium-Range Streamflow Forecasting

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2011:;Volume( 012 ):;issue: 005::page 713
    Author:
    Cuo, Lan
    ,
    Pagano, Thomas C.
    ,
    Wang, Q. J.
    DOI: 10.1175/2011JHM1347.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: nknown future precipitation is the dominant source of uncertainty for many streamflow forecasts. Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models can be used to generate quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) to reduce this uncertainty. The usability and usefulness of NWP model outputs depend on the application time and space scales as well as forecast lead time. For streamflow nowcasting (very short lead times; e.g., 12 h), many applications are based on measured in situ or radar-based real-time precipitation and/or the extrapolation of recent precipitation patterns. QPF based on NWP model output may be more useful in extending forecast lead time, particularly in the range of a few days to a week, although low NWP model skill remains a major obstacle. Ensemble outputs from NWP models are used to articulate QPF uncertainty, improve forecast skill, and extend forecast lead times. Hydrologic prediction driven by these ensembles has been an active research field, although operational adoption has lagged behind. Conversely, relatively little study has been done on the hydrologic component (i.e., model, parameter, and initial condition) of uncertainty in the streamflow prediction system. Four domains of research are identified: selection and evaluation of NWP model?based QPF products, improved QPF products, appropriate hydrologic modeling, and integrated applications.
    • Download: (600.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Review of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts and Their Use in Short- to Medium-Range Streamflow Forecasting

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4213981
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCuo, Lan
    contributor authorPagano, Thomas C.
    contributor authorWang, Q. J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:40:34Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:40:34Z
    date copyright2011/10/01
    date issued2011
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-72023.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213981
    description abstractnknown future precipitation is the dominant source of uncertainty for many streamflow forecasts. Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models can be used to generate quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) to reduce this uncertainty. The usability and usefulness of NWP model outputs depend on the application time and space scales as well as forecast lead time. For streamflow nowcasting (very short lead times; e.g., 12 h), many applications are based on measured in situ or radar-based real-time precipitation and/or the extrapolation of recent precipitation patterns. QPF based on NWP model output may be more useful in extending forecast lead time, particularly in the range of a few days to a week, although low NWP model skill remains a major obstacle. Ensemble outputs from NWP models are used to articulate QPF uncertainty, improve forecast skill, and extend forecast lead times. Hydrologic prediction driven by these ensembles has been an active research field, although operational adoption has lagged behind. Conversely, relatively little study has been done on the hydrologic component (i.e., model, parameter, and initial condition) of uncertainty in the streamflow prediction system. Four domains of research are identified: selection and evaluation of NWP model?based QPF products, improved QPF products, appropriate hydrologic modeling, and integrated applications.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Review of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts and Their Use in Short- to Medium-Range Streamflow Forecasting
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/2011JHM1347.1
    journal fristpage713
    journal lastpage728
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2011:;Volume( 012 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian