YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Assessment of the Uncertainties in Ocean Surface Turbulent Fluxes in 11 Reanalysis, Satellite-Derived, and Combined Global Datasets

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2011:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 021::page 5469
    Author:
    Brunke, Michael A.
    ,
    Wang, Zhuo
    ,
    Zeng, Xubin
    ,
    Bosilovich, Michael
    ,
    Shie, Chung-Lin
    DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI4223.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: cean surface turbulent fluxes play an important role in the energy and water cycles of the atmosphere?ocean coupled system, and several flux products have become available in recent years. Here, turbulent fluxes from 6 widely used reanalyses, 4 satellite-derived flux products, and 2 combined product are evaluated by comparison with direct covariance latent heat (LH) and sensible heat (SH) fluxes and inertial-dissipation wind stresses measured from 12 cruises over the tropics and mid- and high latitudes. The biases range from ?3.0 to 20.2 W m?2 for LH flux, from ?1.4 to 6.0 W m?2 for SH flux, and from ?7.6 to 7.9 ? 10?3 N m?2 for wind stress. These biases are small for moderate wind speeds but diverge for strong wind speeds (>10 m s?1). The total flux biases are then further evaluated by dividing them into uncertainties due to errors in the bulk variables and the residual uncertainty. The bulk-variable-caused uncertainty dominates many products? SH flux and wind stress biases. The biases in the bulk variables that contribute to this uncertainty can be quite high depending on the cruise and the variable. On the basis of a ranking of each product?s flux, it is found that the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) is among the ?best performing? for all three fluxes. Also, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction?Department of Energy (NCEP?DOE) reanalysis are among the best performing for two of the three fluxes. Of the satellite-derived products, version 2b of the Goddard Satellite-Based Surface Turbulent Fluxes (GSSTF2b) is among the best performing for two of the three fluxes. Also among the best performing for only one of the fluxes are the 40-yr ERA (ERA-40) and the combined product objectively analyzed air?sea fluxes (OAFlux). Direction for the future development of ocean surface flux datasets is also suggested.
    • Download: (2.422Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Assessment of the Uncertainties in Ocean Surface Turbulent Fluxes in 11 Reanalysis, Satellite-Derived, and Combined Global Datasets

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4213936
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrunke, Michael A.
    contributor authorWang, Zhuo
    contributor authorZeng, Xubin
    contributor authorBosilovich, Michael
    contributor authorShie, Chung-Lin
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:40:27Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:40:27Z
    date copyright2011/11/01
    date issued2011
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-71984.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213936
    description abstractcean surface turbulent fluxes play an important role in the energy and water cycles of the atmosphere?ocean coupled system, and several flux products have become available in recent years. Here, turbulent fluxes from 6 widely used reanalyses, 4 satellite-derived flux products, and 2 combined product are evaluated by comparison with direct covariance latent heat (LH) and sensible heat (SH) fluxes and inertial-dissipation wind stresses measured from 12 cruises over the tropics and mid- and high latitudes. The biases range from ?3.0 to 20.2 W m?2 for LH flux, from ?1.4 to 6.0 W m?2 for SH flux, and from ?7.6 to 7.9 ? 10?3 N m?2 for wind stress. These biases are small for moderate wind speeds but diverge for strong wind speeds (>10 m s?1). The total flux biases are then further evaluated by dividing them into uncertainties due to errors in the bulk variables and the residual uncertainty. The bulk-variable-caused uncertainty dominates many products? SH flux and wind stress biases. The biases in the bulk variables that contribute to this uncertainty can be quite high depending on the cruise and the variable. On the basis of a ranking of each product?s flux, it is found that the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) is among the ?best performing? for all three fluxes. Also, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim) and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction?Department of Energy (NCEP?DOE) reanalysis are among the best performing for two of the three fluxes. Of the satellite-derived products, version 2b of the Goddard Satellite-Based Surface Turbulent Fluxes (GSSTF2b) is among the best performing for two of the three fluxes. Also among the best performing for only one of the fluxes are the 40-yr ERA (ERA-40) and the combined product objectively analyzed air?sea fluxes (OAFlux). Direction for the future development of ocean surface flux datasets is also suggested.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAn Assessment of the Uncertainties in Ocean Surface Turbulent Fluxes in 11 Reanalysis, Satellite-Derived, and Combined Global Datasets
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue21
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/2011JCLI4223.1
    journal fristpage5469
    journal lastpage5493
    treeJournal of Climate:;2011:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 021
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian