Show simple item record

contributor authorLim, Eun-Pa
contributor authorHendon, Harry H.
contributor authorAnderson, David L. T.
contributor authorCharles, Andrew
contributor authorAlves, Oscar
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:38:12Z
date available2017-06-09T16:38:12Z
date copyright2011/03/01
date issued2010
identifier issn0027-0644
identifier otherams-71349.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213231
description abstractThe prediction skill of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology dynamical seasonal forecast model Predictive Ocean Atmosphere Model for Australia (POAMA) is assessed for probabilistic forecasts of spring season rainfall in Australia and the feasibility of increasing forecast skill through statistical postprocessing is examined. Two statistical postprocessing techniques are explored: calibrating POAMA prediction of rainfall anomaly against observations and using dynamically predicted mean sea level pressure to infer regional rainfall anomaly over Australia (referred to as ?bridging?). A ?homogeneous? multimodel ensemble prediction method (HMME) is also introduced that consists of the combination of POAMA?s direct prediction of rainfall anomaly together with the two statistically postprocessed predictions. Using hindcasts for the period 1981?2006, the direct forecasts from POAMA exhibit skill relative to a climatological forecast over broad areas of eastern and southern Australia, where El Niño and the Indian Ocean dipole (whose behavior POAMA can skillfully predict at short lead times) are known to exert a strong influence in austral spring. The calibrated and bridged forecasts, while potentially offering improvement over the direct forecasts because of POAMA?s ability to predict the main drivers of springtime rainfall (e.g., El Niño and the Southern Oscillation), show only limited areas of improvement, mainly because strict cross-validation limits the ability to capitalize on relatively modest predictive signals with short record lengths. However, when POAMA and the two statistical?dynamical rainfall forecasts are combined in the HMME, higher deterministic and probabilistic skill is achieved over any of the single models, which suggests the HMME is another useful method to calibrate dynamical model forecasts.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleDynamical, Statistical–Dynamical, and Multimodel Ensemble Forecasts of Australian Spring Season Rainfall
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue3
journal titleMonthly Weather Review
identifier doi10.1175/2010MWR3399.1
journal fristpage958
journal lastpage975
treeMonthly Weather Review:;2010:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record