YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison between Raw Ensemble Output, (Modified) Bayesian Model Averaging, and Extended Logistic Regression Using ECMWF Ensemble Precipitation Reforecasts

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2010:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 011::page 4199
    Author:
    Schmeits, Maurice J.
    ,
    Kok, Kees J.
    DOI: 10.1175/2010MWR3285.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Using a 20-yr ECMWF ensemble reforecast dataset of total precipitation and a 20-yr dataset of a dense precipitation observation network in the Netherlands, a comparison is made between the raw ensemble output, Bayesian model averaging (BMA), and extended logistic regression (LR). A previous study indicated that BMA and conventional LR are successful in calibrating multimodel ensemble forecasts of precipitation for a single forecast projection. However, a more elaborate comparison between these methods has not yet been made. This study compares the raw ensemble output, BMA, and extended LR for single-model ensemble reforecasts of precipitation; namely, from the ECMWF ensemble prediction system (EPS). The raw EPS output turns out to be generally well calibrated up to 6 forecast days, if compared to the area-mean 24-h precipitation sum. Surprisingly, BMA is less skillful than the raw EPS output from forecast day 3 onward. This is due to the bias correction in BMA, which applies model output statistics to individual ensemble members. As a result, the spread of the bias-corrected ensemble members is decreased, especially for the longer forecast projections. Here, an additive bias correction is applied instead and the equation for the probability of precipitation in BMA is also changed. These modifications to BMA are referred to as ?modified BMA? and lead to a significant improvement in the skill of BMA for the longer projections. If the area-maximum 24-h precipitation sum is used as a predictand, both modified BMA and extended LR improve the raw EPS output significantly for the first 5 forecast days. However, the difference in skill between modified BMA and extended LR does not seem to be statistically significant. Yet, extended LR might be preferred, because incorporating predictors that are different from the predictand is straightforward, in contrast to BMA.
    • Download: (1.778Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison between Raw Ensemble Output, (Modified) Bayesian Model Averaging, and Extended Logistic Regression Using ECMWF Ensemble Precipitation Reforecasts

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4213147
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSchmeits, Maurice J.
    contributor authorKok, Kees J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:37:53Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:37:53Z
    date copyright2010/11/01
    date issued2010
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-71273.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213147
    description abstractUsing a 20-yr ECMWF ensemble reforecast dataset of total precipitation and a 20-yr dataset of a dense precipitation observation network in the Netherlands, a comparison is made between the raw ensemble output, Bayesian model averaging (BMA), and extended logistic regression (LR). A previous study indicated that BMA and conventional LR are successful in calibrating multimodel ensemble forecasts of precipitation for a single forecast projection. However, a more elaborate comparison between these methods has not yet been made. This study compares the raw ensemble output, BMA, and extended LR for single-model ensemble reforecasts of precipitation; namely, from the ECMWF ensemble prediction system (EPS). The raw EPS output turns out to be generally well calibrated up to 6 forecast days, if compared to the area-mean 24-h precipitation sum. Surprisingly, BMA is less skillful than the raw EPS output from forecast day 3 onward. This is due to the bias correction in BMA, which applies model output statistics to individual ensemble members. As a result, the spread of the bias-corrected ensemble members is decreased, especially for the longer forecast projections. Here, an additive bias correction is applied instead and the equation for the probability of precipitation in BMA is also changed. These modifications to BMA are referred to as ?modified BMA? and lead to a significant improvement in the skill of BMA for the longer projections. If the area-maximum 24-h precipitation sum is used as a predictand, both modified BMA and extended LR improve the raw EPS output significantly for the first 5 forecast days. However, the difference in skill between modified BMA and extended LR does not seem to be statistically significant. Yet, extended LR might be preferred, because incorporating predictors that are different from the predictand is straightforward, in contrast to BMA.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Comparison between Raw Ensemble Output, (Modified) Bayesian Model Averaging, and Extended Logistic Regression Using ECMWF Ensemble Precipitation Reforecasts
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue11
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/2010MWR3285.1
    journal fristpage4199
    journal lastpage4211
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2010:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian