Assimilation of Satellite-Derived Skin Temperature Observations into Land Surface ModelsSource: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2010:;Volume( 011 ):;issue: 005::page 1103DOI: 10.1175/2010JHM1262.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Land surface (or ?skin?) temperature (LST) lies at the heart of the surface energy balance and is a key variable in weather and climate models. In this research LST retrievals from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) are assimilated into the Noah land surface model and Catchment land surface model (CLSM) using an ensemble-based, offline land data assimilation system. LST is described very differently in the two models. A priori scaling and dynamic bias estimation approaches are applied because satellite and model LSTs typically exhibit different mean values and variabilities. Performance is measured against 27 months of in situ measurements from the Coordinated Energy and Water Cycle Observations Project at 48 stations. LST estimates from Noah and CLSM without data assimilation (?open loop?) are comparable to each other and superior to ISCCP retrievals. For LST, the RMSE values are 4.9 K (CLSM), 5.5 K (Noah), and 7.6 K (ISCCP), and the anomaly correlation coefficients (R) are 0.61 (CLSM), 0.63 (Noah), and 0.52 (ISCCP). Assimilation of ISCCP retrievals provides modest yet statistically significant improvements (over an open loop, as indicated by nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals) of up to 0.7 K in RMSE and 0.05 in the anomaly R. The skill of the latent and sensible heat flux estimates from the assimilation integrations is essentially identical to the corresponding open loop skill. Noah assimilation estimates of ground heat flux, however, can be significantly worse than open loop estimates. Provided the assimilation system is properly adapted to each land model, the benefits from the assimilation of LST retrievals are comparable for both models.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Reichle, Rolf H. | |
contributor author | Kumar, Sujay V. | |
contributor author | Mahanama, Sarith P. P. | |
contributor author | Koster, Randal D. | |
contributor author | Liu, Q. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:36:28Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:36:28Z | |
date copyright | 2010/10/01 | |
date issued | 2010 | |
identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
identifier other | ams-70840.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4212665 | |
description abstract | Land surface (or ?skin?) temperature (LST) lies at the heart of the surface energy balance and is a key variable in weather and climate models. In this research LST retrievals from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) are assimilated into the Noah land surface model and Catchment land surface model (CLSM) using an ensemble-based, offline land data assimilation system. LST is described very differently in the two models. A priori scaling and dynamic bias estimation approaches are applied because satellite and model LSTs typically exhibit different mean values and variabilities. Performance is measured against 27 months of in situ measurements from the Coordinated Energy and Water Cycle Observations Project at 48 stations. LST estimates from Noah and CLSM without data assimilation (?open loop?) are comparable to each other and superior to ISCCP retrievals. For LST, the RMSE values are 4.9 K (CLSM), 5.5 K (Noah), and 7.6 K (ISCCP), and the anomaly correlation coefficients (R) are 0.61 (CLSM), 0.63 (Noah), and 0.52 (ISCCP). Assimilation of ISCCP retrievals provides modest yet statistically significant improvements (over an open loop, as indicated by nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals) of up to 0.7 K in RMSE and 0.05 in the anomaly R. The skill of the latent and sensible heat flux estimates from the assimilation integrations is essentially identical to the corresponding open loop skill. Noah assimilation estimates of ground heat flux, however, can be significantly worse than open loop estimates. Provided the assimilation system is properly adapted to each land model, the benefits from the assimilation of LST retrievals are comparable for both models. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Assimilation of Satellite-Derived Skin Temperature Observations into Land Surface Models | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 11 | |
journal issue | 5 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2010JHM1262.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1103 | |
journal lastpage | 1122 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2010:;Volume( 011 ):;issue: 005 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |