YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Using and Designing GCM–RCM Ensemble Regional Climate Projections

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2010:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 024::page 6485
    Author:
    Kendon, Elizabeth J.
    ,
    Jones, Richard G.
    ,
    Kjellström, Erik
    ,
    Murphy, James M.
    DOI: 10.1175/2010JCLI3502.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Multimodel ensembles, whereby different global climate models (GCMs) and regional climate models (RCMs) are combined, have been widely used to explore uncertainties in regional climate projections. In this study, the extent to which information can be enhanced from sparsely filled GCM?RCM ensemble matrices and the way in which simulations should be prioritized to sample uncertainties most effectively are examined. A simple scaling technique, whereby the local climate response in an RCM is predicted from the large-scale change in the GCM, is found to often show skill in estimating local changes for missing GCM?RCM combinations. In particular, scaling shows skill for precipitation indices (including mean, variance, and extremes) across Europe in winter and mean and extreme temperature in summer and winter, except for hot extremes over central/northern Europe in summer. However, internal variability significantly impacts the ability to determine scaling skill for precipitation indices, with a three-member ensemble found to be insufficient for identifying robust local scaling relationships in many cases. This study suggests that, given limited computer resources, ensembles should be designed to prioritize the sampling of GCM uncertainty, using a reduced set of RCMs. Exceptions are found over the Alps and northeastern Europe in winter and central Europe in summer, where sampling multiple RCMs may be equally or more important for capturing uncertainty in local temperature or precipitation change. This reflects the significant role of local processes in these regions. Also, to determine the ensemble strategy in some cases, notably precipitation extremes in summer, better sampling of internal variability is needed.
    • Download: (6.045Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Using and Designing GCM–RCM Ensemble Regional Climate Projections

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4212326
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKendon, Elizabeth J.
    contributor authorJones, Richard G.
    contributor authorKjellström, Erik
    contributor authorMurphy, James M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:35:25Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:35:25Z
    date copyright2010/12/01
    date issued2010
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-70534.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4212326
    description abstractMultimodel ensembles, whereby different global climate models (GCMs) and regional climate models (RCMs) are combined, have been widely used to explore uncertainties in regional climate projections. In this study, the extent to which information can be enhanced from sparsely filled GCM?RCM ensemble matrices and the way in which simulations should be prioritized to sample uncertainties most effectively are examined. A simple scaling technique, whereby the local climate response in an RCM is predicted from the large-scale change in the GCM, is found to often show skill in estimating local changes for missing GCM?RCM combinations. In particular, scaling shows skill for precipitation indices (including mean, variance, and extremes) across Europe in winter and mean and extreme temperature in summer and winter, except for hot extremes over central/northern Europe in summer. However, internal variability significantly impacts the ability to determine scaling skill for precipitation indices, with a three-member ensemble found to be insufficient for identifying robust local scaling relationships in many cases. This study suggests that, given limited computer resources, ensembles should be designed to prioritize the sampling of GCM uncertainty, using a reduced set of RCMs. Exceptions are found over the Alps and northeastern Europe in winter and central Europe in summer, where sampling multiple RCMs may be equally or more important for capturing uncertainty in local temperature or precipitation change. This reflects the significant role of local processes in these regions. Also, to determine the ensemble strategy in some cases, notably precipitation extremes in summer, better sampling of internal variability is needed.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleUsing and Designing GCM–RCM Ensemble Regional Climate Projections
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal issue24
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/2010JCLI3502.1
    journal fristpage6485
    journal lastpage6503
    treeJournal of Climate:;2010:;volume( 023 ):;issue: 024
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian