Show simple item record

contributor authorAndersson, Axel
contributor authorKlepp, Christian
contributor authorFennig, Karsten
contributor authorBakan, Stephan
contributor authorGrassl, Hartmut
contributor authorSchulz, Jörg
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:33:38Z
date available2017-06-09T16:33:38Z
date copyright2011/02/01
date issued2010
identifier issn1558-8424
identifier otherams-69997.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211727
description abstractToday, latent heat flux and precipitation over the global ocean surface can be determined from microwave satellite data as a basis for estimating the related fields of the ocean surface freshwater flux. The Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and Fluxes from Satellite Data (HOAPS) is the only generally available satellite-based dataset with consistently derived global fields of both evaporation and precipitation and hence of freshwater flux for the period 1987?2005. This paper presents a comparison of the evaporation E, precipitation P, and the resulting freshwater flux E ? P in HOAPS with recently available reference datasets from reanalysis and other satellite observation projects as well as in situ ship measurements. In addition, the humidity and wind speed input parameters for the evaporation are examined to identify sources for differences between the datasets. Results show that the general climatological patterns are reproduced by all datasets. Global mean time series often agree within about 10% of the individual products, while locally larger deviations may be found for all parameters. HOAPS often agrees better with the other satellite-derived datasets than with the in situ or the reanalysis data. The agreement usually improves in regions of good in situ sampling statistics. The biggest deviations of the evaporation parameter result from differences in the near-surface humidity estimates. The precipitation datasets exhibit large differences in highly variable regimes with the largest absolute differences in the ITCZ and the largest relative biases in the extratropical storm-track regions. The resulting freshwater flux estimates exhibit distinct differences in terms of global averages as well as regional biases. In comparison with long-term mean global river runoff data, the ocean surface freshwater balance is not closed by any of the compared fields. The datasets exhibit a positive bias in E ? P of 0.2?0.5 mm day?1, which is on the order of 10% of the evaporation and precipitation estimates.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleEvaluation of HOAPS-3 Ocean Surface Freshwater Flux Components
typeJournal Paper
journal volume50
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
identifier doi10.1175/2010JAMC2341.1
journal fristpage379
journal lastpage398
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2010:;volume( 050 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record