YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sensitivity of Surface Air Temperature Analyses to Background and Observation Errors

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2009:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 003::page 852
    Author:
    Tyndall, Daniel P.
    ,
    Horel, John D.
    ,
    de Pondeca, Manuel S. F. V.
    DOI: 10.1175/2009WAF2222304.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A two-dimensional variational method is used to analyze 2-m air temperatures over a limited domain (4° latitude ? 4° longitude) in order to evaluate approaches to examining the sensitivity of the temperature analysis to the specification of observation and background errors. This local surface analysis (LSA) utilizes the 1-h forecast from the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) downscaled to a 5-km resolution terrain level for its background fields and observations obtained from the Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System. The observation error variance as a function of broad network categories and the error variance and covariance of the downscaled 1-h RUC background fields are estimated using a sample of over 7 million 2-m air temperature observations in the continental United States collected during the period 8 May?7 June 2008. The ratio of observation to background error variance is found to be between 2 and 3. This ratio is likely even higher in mountainous regions where representativeness errors attributed to the observations are large. The technique used to evaluate the sensitivity of the 2-m air temperature to the ratio of the observation and background error variance and background error length scales is illustrated over the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia for a particularly challenging case (0900 UTC 22 October 2007) when large horizontal temperature gradients were present in the mountainous regions as well as over two entire days (20 and 27 May 2009). Sets of data denial experiments in which observations are randomly and uniquely removed from each analysis are generated and evaluated. This method demonstrates the effects of overfitting the analysis to the observations.
    • Download: (2.708Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Sensitivity of Surface Air Temperature Analyses to Background and Observation Errors

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4211489
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTyndall, Daniel P.
    contributor authorHorel, John D.
    contributor authorde Pondeca, Manuel S. F. V.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:32:55Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:32:55Z
    date copyright2010/06/01
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-69782.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211489
    description abstractA two-dimensional variational method is used to analyze 2-m air temperatures over a limited domain (4° latitude ? 4° longitude) in order to evaluate approaches to examining the sensitivity of the temperature analysis to the specification of observation and background errors. This local surface analysis (LSA) utilizes the 1-h forecast from the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) downscaled to a 5-km resolution terrain level for its background fields and observations obtained from the Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System. The observation error variance as a function of broad network categories and the error variance and covariance of the downscaled 1-h RUC background fields are estimated using a sample of over 7 million 2-m air temperature observations in the continental United States collected during the period 8 May?7 June 2008. The ratio of observation to background error variance is found to be between 2 and 3. This ratio is likely even higher in mountainous regions where representativeness errors attributed to the observations are large. The technique used to evaluate the sensitivity of the 2-m air temperature to the ratio of the observation and background error variance and background error length scales is illustrated over the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia for a particularly challenging case (0900 UTC 22 October 2007) when large horizontal temperature gradients were present in the mountainous regions as well as over two entire days (20 and 27 May 2009). Sets of data denial experiments in which observations are randomly and uniquely removed from each analysis are generated and evaluated. This method demonstrates the effects of overfitting the analysis to the observations.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSensitivity of Surface Air Temperature Analyses to Background and Observation Errors
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue3
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/2009WAF2222304.1
    journal fristpage852
    journal lastpage865
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2009:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian