YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Aura MLS Water Vapor Measurements with GFS and NAM Analyses in the Upper Troposphere–Lower Stratosphere

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2010:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 002::page 274
    Author:
    Van Thien, Le
    ,
    Gallus, William A.
    ,
    Olsen, Mark A.
    ,
    Livesey, Nathaniel
    DOI: 10.1175/2009JTECHA1317.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Water vapor mixing ratios in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere measured by the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) version 2.2 instrument have been compared with Global Forecast System (GFS) analyses at five levels within the 300?100-hPa layer and North American Mesoscale (NAM) model analyses at six levels within the 300?50-hPa layer over the two years of 2005 and 2006 at four analysis times (e.g., 0000, 0600, 1200, and 1800 UTC). Probability density functions of the vapor mixing ratios suggest that both analyses are often moister than Aura MLS values, but NAM model analyses agree somewhat better with Aura MLS measurements than GFS model analyses over the same North American domain at the five common levels. Examining five subsets of the global GFS domain, the GFS model analysis is moister than Aura MLS estimates everywhere but at 150 and 100 hPa in all regions outside of the tropics. NAM model analysis water vapor mixing ratios exceeded the Aura MLS values at all levels from 250 to 150 hPa in all four seasons of both years and some seasons at 100 and 50 hPa. Moist biases in winter and spring of both years were similar at all levels, but these moist biases in summer and fall were smaller in 2005 than in 2006 at all levels. These differences may be due to the change in the NAM from using the Eta Model to using the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) in June 2006.
    • Download: (2.146Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Aura MLS Water Vapor Measurements with GFS and NAM Analyses in the Upper Troposphere–Lower Stratosphere

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4211024
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVan Thien, Le
    contributor authorGallus, William A.
    contributor authorOlsen, Mark A.
    contributor authorLivesey, Nathaniel
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:31:23Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:31:23Z
    date copyright2010/02/01
    date issued2010
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-69363.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211024
    description abstractWater vapor mixing ratios in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere measured by the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) version 2.2 instrument have been compared with Global Forecast System (GFS) analyses at five levels within the 300?100-hPa layer and North American Mesoscale (NAM) model analyses at six levels within the 300?50-hPa layer over the two years of 2005 and 2006 at four analysis times (e.g., 0000, 0600, 1200, and 1800 UTC). Probability density functions of the vapor mixing ratios suggest that both analyses are often moister than Aura MLS values, but NAM model analyses agree somewhat better with Aura MLS measurements than GFS model analyses over the same North American domain at the five common levels. Examining five subsets of the global GFS domain, the GFS model analysis is moister than Aura MLS estimates everywhere but at 150 and 100 hPa in all regions outside of the tropics. NAM model analysis water vapor mixing ratios exceeded the Aura MLS values at all levels from 250 to 150 hPa in all four seasons of both years and some seasons at 100 and 50 hPa. Moist biases in winter and spring of both years were similar at all levels, but these moist biases in summer and fall were smaller in 2005 than in 2006 at all levels. These differences may be due to the change in the NAM from using the Eta Model to using the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) in June 2006.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of Aura MLS Water Vapor Measurements with GFS and NAM Analyses in the Upper Troposphere–Lower Stratosphere
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume27
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/2009JTECHA1317.1
    journal fristpage274
    journal lastpage289
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2010:;volume( 027 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian