YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Meridional Density Gradients Do Not Control the Atlantic Overturning Circulation

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;2010:;Volume( 040 ):;issue: 002::page 368
    Author:
    de Boer, Agatha M.
    ,
    Gnanadesikan, Anand
    ,
    Edwards, Neil R.
    ,
    Watson, Andrew J.
    DOI: 10.1175/2009JPO4200.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A wide body of modeling and theoretical scaling studies support the concept that changes to the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), whether forced by winds or buoyancy fluxes, can be understood in terms of a simple causative relation between the AMOC and an appropriately defined meridional density gradient (MDG). The MDG is supposed to translate directly into a meridional pressure gradient. Here two sets of experiments are performed using a modular ocean model coupled to an energy?moisture balance model in which the positive AMOC?MDG relation breaks down. In the first suite of seven model integrations it is found that increasing winds in the Southern Ocean cause an increase in overturning while the surface density difference between the equator and North Atlantic drops. In the second suite of eight model integrations the equation of state is manipulated so that the density is calculated at the model temperature plus an artificial increment ?T that ranges from ?3° to 9°C. (An increase in ?T results in increased sensitivity of density to temperature gradients.) The AMOC in these model integrations drops as the MDG increases regardless of whether the density difference is computed at the surface or averaged over the upper ocean. Traditional scaling analysis can only produce this weaker AMOC if the scale depth decreases enough to compensate for the stronger MDG. Five estimates of the depth scale are evaluated and it is found that the changes in the AMOC can be derived from scaling analysis when using the depth of the maximum overturning circulation or estimates thereof but not from the pycnocline depth. These two depth scales are commonly assumed to be the same in theoretical models of the AMOC. It is suggested that the correlation between the MDG and AMOC breaks down in these model integrations because the depth and strength of the AMOC is influenced strongly by remote forcing such as Southern Ocean winds and Antarctic Bottom Water formation.
    • Download: (1.671Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Meridional Density Gradients Do Not Control the Atlantic Overturning Circulation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4210853
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorde Boer, Agatha M.
    contributor authorGnanadesikan, Anand
    contributor authorEdwards, Neil R.
    contributor authorWatson, Andrew J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:30:48Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:30:48Z
    date copyright2010/02/01
    date issued2010
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-69209.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4210853
    description abstractA wide body of modeling and theoretical scaling studies support the concept that changes to the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), whether forced by winds or buoyancy fluxes, can be understood in terms of a simple causative relation between the AMOC and an appropriately defined meridional density gradient (MDG). The MDG is supposed to translate directly into a meridional pressure gradient. Here two sets of experiments are performed using a modular ocean model coupled to an energy?moisture balance model in which the positive AMOC?MDG relation breaks down. In the first suite of seven model integrations it is found that increasing winds in the Southern Ocean cause an increase in overturning while the surface density difference between the equator and North Atlantic drops. In the second suite of eight model integrations the equation of state is manipulated so that the density is calculated at the model temperature plus an artificial increment ?T that ranges from ?3° to 9°C. (An increase in ?T results in increased sensitivity of density to temperature gradients.) The AMOC in these model integrations drops as the MDG increases regardless of whether the density difference is computed at the surface or averaged over the upper ocean. Traditional scaling analysis can only produce this weaker AMOC if the scale depth decreases enough to compensate for the stronger MDG. Five estimates of the depth scale are evaluated and it is found that the changes in the AMOC can be derived from scaling analysis when using the depth of the maximum overturning circulation or estimates thereof but not from the pycnocline depth. These two depth scales are commonly assumed to be the same in theoretical models of the AMOC. It is suggested that the correlation between the MDG and AMOC breaks down in these model integrations because the depth and strength of the AMOC is influenced strongly by remote forcing such as Southern Ocean winds and Antarctic Bottom Water formation.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleMeridional Density Gradients Do Not Control the Atlantic Overturning Circulation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume40
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/2009JPO4200.1
    journal fristpage368
    journal lastpage380
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;2010:;Volume( 040 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian