Modulation of the Period of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation by the Solar CycleSource: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2009:;Volume( 066 ):;issue: 008::page 2418DOI: 10.1175/2009JAS2958.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: The authors examine the mechanism of solar cycle modulation of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) period using the Two-and-a-Half-Dimensional Interactive Isentropic Research (THINAIR) model. Previous model results (using 2D and 3D models of varying complexity) have not convincingly established the proposed link of longer QBO periods during solar minima. Observational evidence for such a modulation is also controversial because it is only found during the period from the 1960s to the early 1990s, which is contaminated by volcanic aerosols. In the model, 200- and 400-yr runs without volcano influence can be obtained, long enough to establish some statistical robustness. Both in model and observed data, there is a strong synchronization of the QBO period with integer multiples of the semiannual oscillation (SAO) in the upper stratosphere. Under the current level of wave forcing, the period of the QBO jumps from one multiple of SAO to another and back so that it averages to 28 months, never settling down to a constant period. The ?decadal? variability in the QBO period takes the form of ?quantum? jumps; these, however, do not appear to follow the level of the solar flux in either the observation or the model using realistic quasi-periodic solar cycle (SC) forcing. To understand the solar modulation of the QBO period, the authors perform model runs with a range of perpetual solar forcing, either lower or higher than the current level. At the current level of solar forcing, the model QBO period consists of a distribution of four and five SAO periods, similar to the observed distribution. This distribution changes as solar forcing changes. For lower (higher) solar forcing, the distribution shifts to more (less) four SAO periods than five SAO periods. The record-averaged QBO period increases with the solar forcing. However, because this effect is rather weak and is detectable only with exaggerated forcing, the authors suggest that the previous result of the anticorrelation of the QBO period with the SC seen in short observational records reflects only a chance behavior of the QBO period, which naturally jumps in a nonstationary manner even if the solar forcing is held constant, and the correlation can change as the record gets longer.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Kuai, Le | |
contributor author | Shia, Run-Lie | |
contributor author | Jiang, Xun | |
contributor author | Tung, Ka Kit | |
contributor author | Yung, Yuk L. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:28:10Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:28:10Z | |
date copyright | 2009/08/01 | |
date issued | 2009 | |
identifier issn | 0022-4928 | |
identifier other | ams-68425.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4209982 | |
description abstract | The authors examine the mechanism of solar cycle modulation of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) period using the Two-and-a-Half-Dimensional Interactive Isentropic Research (THINAIR) model. Previous model results (using 2D and 3D models of varying complexity) have not convincingly established the proposed link of longer QBO periods during solar minima. Observational evidence for such a modulation is also controversial because it is only found during the period from the 1960s to the early 1990s, which is contaminated by volcanic aerosols. In the model, 200- and 400-yr runs without volcano influence can be obtained, long enough to establish some statistical robustness. Both in model and observed data, there is a strong synchronization of the QBO period with integer multiples of the semiannual oscillation (SAO) in the upper stratosphere. Under the current level of wave forcing, the period of the QBO jumps from one multiple of SAO to another and back so that it averages to 28 months, never settling down to a constant period. The ?decadal? variability in the QBO period takes the form of ?quantum? jumps; these, however, do not appear to follow the level of the solar flux in either the observation or the model using realistic quasi-periodic solar cycle (SC) forcing. To understand the solar modulation of the QBO period, the authors perform model runs with a range of perpetual solar forcing, either lower or higher than the current level. At the current level of solar forcing, the model QBO period consists of a distribution of four and five SAO periods, similar to the observed distribution. This distribution changes as solar forcing changes. For lower (higher) solar forcing, the distribution shifts to more (less) four SAO periods than five SAO periods. The record-averaged QBO period increases with the solar forcing. However, because this effect is rather weak and is detectable only with exaggerated forcing, the authors suggest that the previous result of the anticorrelation of the QBO period with the SC seen in short observational records reflects only a chance behavior of the QBO period, which naturally jumps in a nonstationary manner even if the solar forcing is held constant, and the correlation can change as the record gets longer. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Modulation of the Period of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation by the Solar Cycle | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 66 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2009JAS2958.1 | |
journal fristpage | 2418 | |
journal lastpage | 2428 | |
tree | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2009:;Volume( 066 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |