Reanalyses Suitable for Characterizing Long-Term TrendsSource: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2010:;volume( 091 ):;issue: 003::page 353DOI: 10.1175/2009BAMS2858.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Reanalyses are, by a substantial margin, the most utilized climate data products, and they are applied in a myriad of different contexts. Despite their popularity, there are substantial concerns about their suitability for the monitoring of long-term climate trends. This has led to calls for a truly ?climate quality? reanalysis that retains long-term trend fidelity. The authors contend that for such a reanalysis to be achieved, a substantial rethinking of the current strategy for producing reanalysis products is required. First, the problem must be defined clearly. Second, the methodology that is employed must be reconsidered so as to minimize potential non-climatic artifacts and robustly ascertain the inevitable residual uncertainty. Finally, a set of validation data and metrics must be constructed that the community can use to compare and unambiguously assess the claims of climate quality. The purpose of this essay is very much to initiate discussions to this end rather than to prescribe solutions.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Thorne, P. W. | |
contributor author | Vose, R. S. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:27:26Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:27:26Z | |
date copyright | 2010/03/01 | |
date issued | 2010 | |
identifier issn | 0003-0007 | |
identifier other | ams-68187.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4209717 | |
description abstract | Reanalyses are, by a substantial margin, the most utilized climate data products, and they are applied in a myriad of different contexts. Despite their popularity, there are substantial concerns about their suitability for the monitoring of long-term climate trends. This has led to calls for a truly ?climate quality? reanalysis that retains long-term trend fidelity. The authors contend that for such a reanalysis to be achieved, a substantial rethinking of the current strategy for producing reanalysis products is required. First, the problem must be defined clearly. Second, the methodology that is employed must be reconsidered so as to minimize potential non-climatic artifacts and robustly ascertain the inevitable residual uncertainty. Finally, a set of validation data and metrics must be constructed that the community can use to compare and unambiguously assess the claims of climate quality. The purpose of this essay is very much to initiate discussions to this end rather than to prescribe solutions. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Reanalyses Suitable for Characterizing Long-Term Trends | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 91 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2009BAMS2858.1 | |
journal fristpage | 353 | |
journal lastpage | 361 | |
tree | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2010:;volume( 091 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |