YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Example of the Use of Mobile, Doppler Radar Data for Tornado Verification

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2009:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 003::page 884
    Author:
    French, Michael M.
    ,
    Bluestein, Howard B.
    ,
    Wicker, Louis J.
    ,
    Dowell, David C.
    ,
    Kramar, Matthew R.
    DOI: 10.1175/2008WAF2222147.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: On 16 May 2003, two ground-based, mobile, Doppler radars scanned a potentially tornadic supercell in the Texas Panhandle intermittently from ?0200 to 0330 UTC. The storm likely was tornadic, but because it was dark, visual confirmation of any tornadoes was not possible. A damage survey was completed after the storm moved through the area. The final conclusion of the damage survey prior to this analysis was that there were two tornadoes near Shamrock, Texas: one that formed prior to 0300 UTC and one that formed at or after 0300 UTC. High-resolution, mobile, Doppler radar data of the supercell were compared with the damage survey information at different times. The location of the first tornado damage path was not consistent with the locations of the low-level circulations in the supercell identified through the mobile, Doppler radar data. The damage within the first path, which consisted mostly of downed trees, may have been caused by straight-line winds in a squall line that moved through the area after the passage of the supercell. The mobile, Doppler radar data did not provide any supporting evidence for the first tornado, but the data did support the existence of the second tornado in Wheeler County on the evening of 15 May 2003. Ground-based, mobile, Doppler radar data may be used as an important tool to help to confirm (or deny) tornado damage reports in situations in which a damage survey cannot be completed or in which the survey does not provide clear evidence as to what phenomenon caused the damage.
    • Download: (2.249Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Example of the Use of Mobile, Doppler Radar Data for Tornado Verification

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4209612
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFrench, Michael M.
    contributor authorBluestein, Howard B.
    contributor authorWicker, Louis J.
    contributor authorDowell, David C.
    contributor authorKramar, Matthew R.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:27:05Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:27:05Z
    date copyright2009/06/01
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-68092.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4209612
    description abstractOn 16 May 2003, two ground-based, mobile, Doppler radars scanned a potentially tornadic supercell in the Texas Panhandle intermittently from ?0200 to 0330 UTC. The storm likely was tornadic, but because it was dark, visual confirmation of any tornadoes was not possible. A damage survey was completed after the storm moved through the area. The final conclusion of the damage survey prior to this analysis was that there were two tornadoes near Shamrock, Texas: one that formed prior to 0300 UTC and one that formed at or after 0300 UTC. High-resolution, mobile, Doppler radar data of the supercell were compared with the damage survey information at different times. The location of the first tornado damage path was not consistent with the locations of the low-level circulations in the supercell identified through the mobile, Doppler radar data. The damage within the first path, which consisted mostly of downed trees, may have been caused by straight-line winds in a squall line that moved through the area after the passage of the supercell. The mobile, Doppler radar data did not provide any supporting evidence for the first tornado, but the data did support the existence of the second tornado in Wheeler County on the evening of 15 May 2003. Ground-based, mobile, Doppler radar data may be used as an important tool to help to confirm (or deny) tornado damage reports in situations in which a damage survey cannot be completed or in which the survey does not provide clear evidence as to what phenomenon caused the damage.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAn Example of the Use of Mobile, Doppler Radar Data for Tornado Verification
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue3
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/2008WAF2222147.1
    journal fristpage884
    journal lastpage891
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2009:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian