YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Variability of Updraft and Downdraft Characteristics in a Large Parameter Space Study of Convective Storms

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2009:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 005::page 1550
    Author:
    Kirkpatrick, Cody
    ,
    McCaul, Eugene W.
    ,
    Cohen, Charles
    DOI: 10.1175/2008MWR2703.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Over 200 convective storm simulations are analyzed to examine the variability in storm vertical velocity and updraft area characteristics as a function of basic environmental parameters. While it is known that bulk properties of the troposphere such as convective available potential energy (CAPE) and deep-layer wind shear exert significant influence over updraft intensity and area, additional parameters such as the temperature at the cloud base, the height of the level of free convection (LFC), and the vertical distribution of buoyancy also have an effect. For example, at low CAPE, updraft strength is strongly related to the vertical distribution of buoyancy, and also to the bulk environmental wind shear. More generally, updraft area and its temporal variability both tend to increase in environments where the LFC is raised. Additionally, in environments with persistent storms, downdraft strength is sensitive to the bulk shear, environmental temperature, and LFC height. Using multiple linear regression methods, the best combinations of environmental parameters explain up to 81% of the interexperiment variance in second-hour mean peak updraft velocity, 74% for midlevel updraft area, and 64% for downdraft velocity. Downdraft variability is explained even less well (49%) when only persistent storms are considered. These idealized simulation results show that it is easier to predict storm updraft characteristics than those of the downdraft.
    • Download: (794.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Variability of Updraft and Downdraft Characteristics in a Large Parameter Space Study of Convective Storms

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4209508
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKirkpatrick, Cody
    contributor authorMcCaul, Eugene W.
    contributor authorCohen, Charles
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:26:43Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:26:43Z
    date copyright2009/05/01
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-68000.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4209508
    description abstractOver 200 convective storm simulations are analyzed to examine the variability in storm vertical velocity and updraft area characteristics as a function of basic environmental parameters. While it is known that bulk properties of the troposphere such as convective available potential energy (CAPE) and deep-layer wind shear exert significant influence over updraft intensity and area, additional parameters such as the temperature at the cloud base, the height of the level of free convection (LFC), and the vertical distribution of buoyancy also have an effect. For example, at low CAPE, updraft strength is strongly related to the vertical distribution of buoyancy, and also to the bulk environmental wind shear. More generally, updraft area and its temporal variability both tend to increase in environments where the LFC is raised. Additionally, in environments with persistent storms, downdraft strength is sensitive to the bulk shear, environmental temperature, and LFC height. Using multiple linear regression methods, the best combinations of environmental parameters explain up to 81% of the interexperiment variance in second-hour mean peak updraft velocity, 74% for midlevel updraft area, and 64% for downdraft velocity. Downdraft variability is explained even less well (49%) when only persistent storms are considered. These idealized simulation results show that it is easier to predict storm updraft characteristics than those of the downdraft.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleVariability of Updraft and Downdraft Characteristics in a Large Parameter Space Study of Convective Storms
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume137
    journal issue5
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/2008MWR2703.1
    journal fristpage1550
    journal lastpage1561
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2009:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian