Four Years of Tropical ERA-40 Vorticity Maxima Tracks. Part II: Differences between Developing and Nondeveloping Disturbances

Abstract

Using a subset of the relative vorticity maxima (VM) tracks described in Part I, large-scale environmental fields, cold cloud area, and rainfall area are used to discriminate between developing and nondeveloping tropical disturbances in the eastern North Pacific (EPAC) and Atlantic Oceans. By using a minimum cold cloud coverage requirement, the nondeveloping VM are limited to disturbances with enhanced low-level relative vorticity and widespread deep convection. Linear discriminant analysis is used to determine the overall discrimination and the relative importance of each predictor for each basin separately. It is important to distinguish the two basins because, for many predictors, the differences between the basins are greater than the differences between developing and nondeveloping VM in each basin. Using the parametric forecast method, there is greater discrimination and prediction skill in the EPAC than in the Atlantic. There are also significant differences between the two basins in terms of the degree of discrimination provided by each of the predictors. Surprisingly, the mean vertical wind shear magnitude is greater for EPAC developing VM than for EPAC nondeveloping VM. Incorporating the satellite-derived predictors marginally improves the potential forecast skill in the EPAC but not in the Atlantic. The prediction skill (Heidke skill score) of tropical cyclogenesis in the Atlantic is similar to what has been obtained in previous studies using cloud cluster tracks. There is greater predictive skill in the EPAC.