YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Use of a Lidar Forward Model for Global Comparisons of Cloud Fraction between the ICESat Lidar and the ECMWF Model

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2008:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 010::page 3742
    Author:
    Wilkinson, Jonathan M.
    ,
    Hogan, Robin J.
    ,
    Illingworth, Anthony J.
    ,
    Benedetti, Angela
    DOI: 10.1175/2008MWR2309.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The performance of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model in simulating clouds is evaluated using observations by the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System lidar on the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat). To account for lidar attenuation in the comparison, model variables are used to simulate the attenuated backscatter using a lidar forward model. This generates a new model cloud fraction that can then be fairly compared with the ICESat lidar. The lidar forward model and ICESat comparison is performed over 15 days (equivalent to 226 orbits of Earth, or roughly 9 million km) of data. The model is assessed by cloud fraction statistics, skill scores, and its ability to simulate lidar backscatter. The results show that the model generally simulates the occurrence and location of clouds well but overestimates the mean amount when present of the ice cloud by around 10%, particularly in the tropics. The skill of the model is slightly better over the land than over the sea. The model also has some problems representing the amount when present in tropical boundary layer cloud, particularly over land, where there is an underestimate by as much as 15%. Calculations of backscatter reveal that the ECMWF model predicts the lidar backscatter to within 5% on average, for a lidar ratio of 20 sr, apart from in thick ice clouds. Sensitivity tests show that realistic variations in extinction-to-backscatter ratio and effective radius affect the forward modeled mean cloud fraction by no more than 10%.
    • Download: (1.868Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Use of a Lidar Forward Model for Global Comparisons of Cloud Fraction between the ICESat Lidar and the ECMWF Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4209275
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWilkinson, Jonathan M.
    contributor authorHogan, Robin J.
    contributor authorIllingworth, Anthony J.
    contributor authorBenedetti, Angela
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:25:59Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:25:59Z
    date copyright2008/10/01
    date issued2008
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-67790.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4209275
    description abstractThe performance of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model in simulating clouds is evaluated using observations by the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System lidar on the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat). To account for lidar attenuation in the comparison, model variables are used to simulate the attenuated backscatter using a lidar forward model. This generates a new model cloud fraction that can then be fairly compared with the ICESat lidar. The lidar forward model and ICESat comparison is performed over 15 days (equivalent to 226 orbits of Earth, or roughly 9 million km) of data. The model is assessed by cloud fraction statistics, skill scores, and its ability to simulate lidar backscatter. The results show that the model generally simulates the occurrence and location of clouds well but overestimates the mean amount when present of the ice cloud by around 10%, particularly in the tropics. The skill of the model is slightly better over the land than over the sea. The model also has some problems representing the amount when present in tropical boundary layer cloud, particularly over land, where there is an underestimate by as much as 15%. Calculations of backscatter reveal that the ECMWF model predicts the lidar backscatter to within 5% on average, for a lidar ratio of 20 sr, apart from in thick ice clouds. Sensitivity tests show that realistic variations in extinction-to-backscatter ratio and effective radius affect the forward modeled mean cloud fraction by no more than 10%.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleUse of a Lidar Forward Model for Global Comparisons of Cloud Fraction between the ICESat Lidar and the ECMWF Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue10
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/2008MWR2309.1
    journal fristpage3742
    journal lastpage3759
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2008:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian