YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Improved Parameterization for Simulating Arctic Cloud Amount in the CCSM3 Climate Model

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2008:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 021::page 5673
    Author:
    Vavrus, Steve
    ,
    Waliser, Duane
    DOI: 10.1175/2008JCLI2299.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A simple alternative parameterization for predicting cloud fraction in the Community Climate System Model, version 3 (CCSM3) global climate model is presented. This formula, dubbed ?freeezedry,? is designed to alleviate the bias of excessive low clouds during polar winter by reducing the cloud amount under very dry conditions. During winter, freezedry decreases the low cloud amount over the coldest regions in high latitudes by over 50% locally and more than 30% averaged across the Arctic. The cloud reduction causes an Arctic-wide drop of 15 W m?2 in surface cloud radiative forcing (CRF) during winter and about a 50% decrease in mean annual Arctic CRF. Consequently, wintertime surface temperatures fall by up to 4 K on land and 2?8 K over the Arctic Ocean, thus significantly reducing the model?s pronounced warm bias. Freezedry also affects CCSM3?s sensitivity to greenhouse forcing. In a transient-CO2 experiment, the model version with freezedry warms up to 20% less in the North Polar and South Polar regions (1.5- and 0.5-K-smaller warming, respectively). Paradoxically, the muted high-latitude response occurs despite a much larger increase in cloud amount with freezedry during nonsummer months (when clouds warm the surface), apparently because of the colder modern reference climate. While improving the polar climate simulation in CCSM3, freezedry has virtually no influence outside of very cold regions and has already been implemented in another climate model, the Global Environmental and Ecological Simulation of Ecological Systems, version 1 (GENESIS1). Furthermore, the simplicity of this parameterization allows it to be readily incorporated into other GCMs, many of which also suffer from excessive wintertime polar cloudiness.
    • Download: (1.852Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Improved Parameterization for Simulating Arctic Cloud Amount in the CCSM3 Climate Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4208537
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVavrus, Steve
    contributor authorWaliser, Duane
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:23:51Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:23:51Z
    date copyright2008/11/01
    date issued2008
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-67124.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4208537
    description abstractA simple alternative parameterization for predicting cloud fraction in the Community Climate System Model, version 3 (CCSM3) global climate model is presented. This formula, dubbed ?freeezedry,? is designed to alleviate the bias of excessive low clouds during polar winter by reducing the cloud amount under very dry conditions. During winter, freezedry decreases the low cloud amount over the coldest regions in high latitudes by over 50% locally and more than 30% averaged across the Arctic. The cloud reduction causes an Arctic-wide drop of 15 W m?2 in surface cloud radiative forcing (CRF) during winter and about a 50% decrease in mean annual Arctic CRF. Consequently, wintertime surface temperatures fall by up to 4 K on land and 2?8 K over the Arctic Ocean, thus significantly reducing the model?s pronounced warm bias. Freezedry also affects CCSM3?s sensitivity to greenhouse forcing. In a transient-CO2 experiment, the model version with freezedry warms up to 20% less in the North Polar and South Polar regions (1.5- and 0.5-K-smaller warming, respectively). Paradoxically, the muted high-latitude response occurs despite a much larger increase in cloud amount with freezedry during nonsummer months (when clouds warm the surface), apparently because of the colder modern reference climate. While improving the polar climate simulation in CCSM3, freezedry has virtually no influence outside of very cold regions and has already been implemented in another climate model, the Global Environmental and Ecological Simulation of Ecological Systems, version 1 (GENESIS1). Furthermore, the simplicity of this parameterization allows it to be readily incorporated into other GCMs, many of which also suffer from excessive wintertime polar cloudiness.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAn Improved Parameterization for Simulating Arctic Cloud Amount in the CCSM3 Climate Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume21
    journal issue21
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/2008JCLI2299.1
    journal fristpage5673
    journal lastpage5687
    treeJournal of Climate:;2008:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 021
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian