Nonstationary Synchronization of Equatorial QBO with SAO in Observations and a ModelSource: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2009:;Volume( 066 ):;issue: 006::page 1654DOI: 10.1175/2008JAS2857.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: It has often been suggested that the period of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) has a tendency to synchronize with the semiannual oscillation (SAO). Apparently the synchronization is better the higher up the observation extends. Using 45 yr of the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40) data of the equatorial stratosphere up to the stratopause, the authors confirm that this synchronization is not just a tendency but a robust phenomenon in the upper stratosphere. A QBO period starts when a westerly SAO (w-SAO) descends from the stratopause to 7 hPa and initiates the westerly phase of the QBO (w-QBO) below. It ends when another w-SAO, a few SAO periods later, descends again to 7 hPa to initiate the next w-QBO. The fact that it is the westerly but not the easterly SAO (e-SAO) that initiates the QBO is also explained by the general easterly bias of the angular momentum in the equatorial stratosphere so that the e-SAO does not create a zero-wind line, unlike the w-SAO. The currently observed average QBO period of 28 months, which is not an integer multiple of SAO periods, is a result of intermittent jumps of the QBO period from four SAO to five SAO periods. The same behavior is also found in the Two and a Half Dimensional Interactive Isentropic Research (THINAIR) model. It is found that the nonstationary behavior in both the observation and model is caused not by the 11-yr solar-cycle forcing but by the incompatibility of the QBO?s natural period (determined by its wave forcing) and the ?quantized? period determined by the SAO. The wave forcing parameter for the QBO period in the current climate probably lies between four SAO and five SAO periods. If the wave forcing for the QBO is tuned so that its natural period is compatible with the SAO period above (e.g., at 24 or 30 months), nonstationary behavior disappears.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Kuai, Le | |
contributor author | Shia, Run-Lie | |
contributor author | Jiang, Xun | |
contributor author | Tung, Ka-Kit | |
contributor author | Yung, Yuk L. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:23:07Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:23:07Z | |
date copyright | 2009/06/01 | |
date issued | 2009 | |
identifier issn | 0022-4928 | |
identifier other | ams-66911.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4208299 | |
description abstract | It has often been suggested that the period of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) has a tendency to synchronize with the semiannual oscillation (SAO). Apparently the synchronization is better the higher up the observation extends. Using 45 yr of the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40) data of the equatorial stratosphere up to the stratopause, the authors confirm that this synchronization is not just a tendency but a robust phenomenon in the upper stratosphere. A QBO period starts when a westerly SAO (w-SAO) descends from the stratopause to 7 hPa and initiates the westerly phase of the QBO (w-QBO) below. It ends when another w-SAO, a few SAO periods later, descends again to 7 hPa to initiate the next w-QBO. The fact that it is the westerly but not the easterly SAO (e-SAO) that initiates the QBO is also explained by the general easterly bias of the angular momentum in the equatorial stratosphere so that the e-SAO does not create a zero-wind line, unlike the w-SAO. The currently observed average QBO period of 28 months, which is not an integer multiple of SAO periods, is a result of intermittent jumps of the QBO period from four SAO to five SAO periods. The same behavior is also found in the Two and a Half Dimensional Interactive Isentropic Research (THINAIR) model. It is found that the nonstationary behavior in both the observation and model is caused not by the 11-yr solar-cycle forcing but by the incompatibility of the QBO?s natural period (determined by its wave forcing) and the ?quantized? period determined by the SAO. The wave forcing parameter for the QBO period in the current climate probably lies between four SAO and five SAO periods. If the wave forcing for the QBO is tuned so that its natural period is compatible with the SAO period above (e.g., at 24 or 30 months), nonstationary behavior disappears. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Nonstationary Synchronization of Equatorial QBO with SAO in Observations and a Model | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 66 | |
journal issue | 6 | |
journal title | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2008JAS2857.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1654 | |
journal lastpage | 1664 | |
tree | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2009:;Volume( 066 ):;issue: 006 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |