YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2008:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 007::page 1073
    Author:
    Ackerman, S. A.
    ,
    Holz, R. E.
    ,
    Frey, R.
    ,
    Eloranta, E. W.
    ,
    Maddux, B. C.
    ,
    McGill, M.
    DOI: 10.1175/2007JTECHA1053.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: An assessment of the performance of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud mask algorithm for Terra and Aqua satellites is presented. The MODIS cloud mask algorithm output is compared with lidar observations from ground [Arctic High-Spectral Resolution Lidar (AHSRL)], aircraft [Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL)], and satellite-borne [Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS)] platforms. The comparison with 3 yr of coincident observations of MODIS and combined radar and lidar cloud product from the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program Southern Great Plains (SGP) site in Lamont, Oklahoma, indicates that the MODIS algorithm agrees with the lidar about 85% of the time. A comparison with the CPL and AHSRL indicates that the optical depth limitation of the MODIS cloud mask is approximately 0.4. While MODIS algorithm flags scenes with a cloud optical depth of 0.4 as cloudy, approximately 90% of the mislabeled scenes have optical depths less than 0.4. A comparison with the GLAS cloud dataset indicates that cloud detection in polar regions at night remains challenging with the passive infrared imager approach. In anticipation of comparisons with other satellite instruments, the sensitivity of the cloud mask algorithm to instrument characteristics (e.g., instantaneous field of view and viewing geometry) and thresholds is demonstrated. As expected, cloud amount generally increases with scan angle and instantaneous field of view (IFOV). Nadir sampling represents zonal monthly mean cloud amounts but can have large differences for regional studies when compared to full-swath-width analysis.
    • Download: (2.521Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4207393
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAckerman, S. A.
    contributor authorHolz, R. E.
    contributor authorFrey, R.
    contributor authorEloranta, E. W.
    contributor authorMaddux, B. C.
    contributor authorMcGill, M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:20:31Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:20:31Z
    date copyright2008/07/01
    date issued2008
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-66095.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207393
    description abstractAn assessment of the performance of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud mask algorithm for Terra and Aqua satellites is presented. The MODIS cloud mask algorithm output is compared with lidar observations from ground [Arctic High-Spectral Resolution Lidar (AHSRL)], aircraft [Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL)], and satellite-borne [Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS)] platforms. The comparison with 3 yr of coincident observations of MODIS and combined radar and lidar cloud product from the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program Southern Great Plains (SGP) site in Lamont, Oklahoma, indicates that the MODIS algorithm agrees with the lidar about 85% of the time. A comparison with the CPL and AHSRL indicates that the optical depth limitation of the MODIS cloud mask is approximately 0.4. While MODIS algorithm flags scenes with a cloud optical depth of 0.4 as cloudy, approximately 90% of the mislabeled scenes have optical depths less than 0.4. A comparison with the GLAS cloud dataset indicates that cloud detection in polar regions at night remains challenging with the passive infrared imager approach. In anticipation of comparisons with other satellite instruments, the sensitivity of the cloud mask algorithm to instrument characteristics (e.g., instantaneous field of view and viewing geometry) and thresholds is demonstrated. As expected, cloud amount generally increases with scan angle and instantaneous field of view (IFOV). Nadir sampling represents zonal monthly mean cloud amounts but can have large differences for regional studies when compared to full-swath-width analysis.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleCloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/2007JTECHA1053.1
    journal fristpage1073
    journal lastpage1086
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2008:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian