Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: ValidationSource: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2008:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 007::page 1073DOI: 10.1175/2007JTECHA1053.1Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: An assessment of the performance of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud mask algorithm for Terra and Aqua satellites is presented. The MODIS cloud mask algorithm output is compared with lidar observations from ground [Arctic High-Spectral Resolution Lidar (AHSRL)], aircraft [Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL)], and satellite-borne [Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS)] platforms. The comparison with 3 yr of coincident observations of MODIS and combined radar and lidar cloud product from the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program Southern Great Plains (SGP) site in Lamont, Oklahoma, indicates that the MODIS algorithm agrees with the lidar about 85% of the time. A comparison with the CPL and AHSRL indicates that the optical depth limitation of the MODIS cloud mask is approximately 0.4. While MODIS algorithm flags scenes with a cloud optical depth of 0.4 as cloudy, approximately 90% of the mislabeled scenes have optical depths less than 0.4. A comparison with the GLAS cloud dataset indicates that cloud detection in polar regions at night remains challenging with the passive infrared imager approach. In anticipation of comparisons with other satellite instruments, the sensitivity of the cloud mask algorithm to instrument characteristics (e.g., instantaneous field of view and viewing geometry) and thresholds is demonstrated. As expected, cloud amount generally increases with scan angle and instantaneous field of view (IFOV). Nadir sampling represents zonal monthly mean cloud amounts but can have large differences for regional studies when compared to full-swath-width analysis.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Ackerman, S. A. | |
contributor author | Holz, R. E. | |
contributor author | Frey, R. | |
contributor author | Eloranta, E. W. | |
contributor author | Maddux, B. C. | |
contributor author | McGill, M. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:20:31Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:20:31Z | |
date copyright | 2008/07/01 | |
date issued | 2008 | |
identifier issn | 0739-0572 | |
identifier other | ams-66095.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4207393 | |
description abstract | An assessment of the performance of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud mask algorithm for Terra and Aqua satellites is presented. The MODIS cloud mask algorithm output is compared with lidar observations from ground [Arctic High-Spectral Resolution Lidar (AHSRL)], aircraft [Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL)], and satellite-borne [Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS)] platforms. The comparison with 3 yr of coincident observations of MODIS and combined radar and lidar cloud product from the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program Southern Great Plains (SGP) site in Lamont, Oklahoma, indicates that the MODIS algorithm agrees with the lidar about 85% of the time. A comparison with the CPL and AHSRL indicates that the optical depth limitation of the MODIS cloud mask is approximately 0.4. While MODIS algorithm flags scenes with a cloud optical depth of 0.4 as cloudy, approximately 90% of the mislabeled scenes have optical depths less than 0.4. A comparison with the GLAS cloud dataset indicates that cloud detection in polar regions at night remains challenging with the passive infrared imager approach. In anticipation of comparisons with other satellite instruments, the sensitivity of the cloud mask algorithm to instrument characteristics (e.g., instantaneous field of view and viewing geometry) and thresholds is demonstrated. As expected, cloud amount generally increases with scan angle and instantaneous field of view (IFOV). Nadir sampling represents zonal monthly mean cloud amounts but can have large differences for regional studies when compared to full-swath-width analysis. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 25 | |
journal issue | 7 | |
journal title | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/2007JTECHA1053.1 | |
journal fristpage | 1073 | |
journal lastpage | 1086 | |
tree | Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2008:;volume( 025 ):;issue: 007 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |