Show simple item record

contributor authorWelch, Ronald M.
contributor authorAsefi, Salvi
contributor authorZeng, Jian
contributor authorNair, Udaysankar S.
contributor authorHan, Qingyuan
contributor authorLawton, Robert O.
contributor authorRay, Deepak K.
contributor authorManoharan, Vani Starry
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:18:16Z
date available2017-06-09T16:18:16Z
date copyright2008/04/01
date issued2008
identifier issn1558-8424
identifier otherams-65372.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206590
description abstractCloud-base heights over tropical montane cloud forests are determined using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud products and National Centers for Environmental Prediction global tropospheric final analysis (FNL) fields. Cloud-base heights are computed by subtracting cloud thickness estimates from cloud-top height estimates. Cloud-top pressures determined from the current MODIS retrieval algorithm often have serious cloud-top pressure retrieval errors at pressures > 700 hPa. The problem can be easily remedied by matching cloud-top temperature derived from the 11-?m channel to the dewpoint temperature profile (instead of the temperature profile) obtained from the FNL dataset. The FNL dataset at 1° spatial resolution produced results that were nearly equivalent to those derived from radiosonde measurements. The following three different approaches for estimating cloud thickness are examined: 1) the constant liquid water method, 2) the empirical method, and 3) the adiabatic model method. The retrieval technique is applied first for stratus clouds over U.S. airports for 12 cases, with cloud-base heights compared with ceilometer measurements. Mean square errors on the order of 200 m result. Then, the approach is applied to orographic clouds over Monteverde, Costa Rica, with estimated cloud-base heights compared with those derived from photographs. Mean square errors on the order of 100 m result. Both the empirical and adiabatic model approaches produce superior results when compared with the constant liquid water (CLW) approach. This is due to the fact that CLW is more sensitive to natural variations in cloud optical thickness.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleBiogeography of Tropical Montane Cloud Forests. Part I: Remote Sensing of Cloud-Base Heights
typeJournal Paper
journal volume47
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
identifier doi10.1175/2007JAMC1668.1
journal fristpage960
journal lastpage975
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2008:;volume( 047 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record