Show simple item record

contributor authorHeymsfield, Andrew J.
contributor authorProtat, Alain
contributor authorBouniol, Dominique
contributor authorAustin, Richard T.
contributor authorHogan, Robin J.
contributor authorDelanoë, Julien
contributor authorOkamoto, Hajime
contributor authorSato, Kaori
contributor authorvan Zadelhoff, Gerd-Jan
contributor authorDonovan, David P.
contributor authorWang, Zhien
date accessioned2017-06-09T16:18:09Z
date available2017-06-09T16:18:09Z
date copyright2008/01/01
date issued2008
identifier issn1558-8424
identifier otherams-65336.pdf
identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206550
description abstractVertical profiles of ice water content (IWC) can now be derived globally from spaceborne cloud satellite radar (CloudSat) data. Integrating these data with Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) data may further increase accuracy. Evaluations of the accuracy of IWC retrieved from radar alone and together with other measurements are now essential. A forward model employing aircraft Lagrangian spiral descents through mid- and low-latitude ice clouds is used to estimate profiles of what a lidar and conventional and Doppler radar would sense. Radar reflectivity Ze and Doppler fall speed at multiple wavelengths and extinction in visible wavelengths were derived from particle size distributions and shape data, constrained by IWC that were measured directly in most instances. These data were provided to eight teams that together cover 10 retrieval methods. Almost 3400 vertically distributed points from 19 clouds were used. Approximate cloud optical depths ranged from below 1 to more than 50. The teams returned retrieval IWC profiles that were evaluated in seven different ways to identify the amount and sources of errors. The mean (median) ratio of the retrieved-to-measured IWC was 1.15 (1.03) ± 0.66 for all teams, 1.08 (1.00) ± 0.60 for those employing a lidar?radar approach, and 1.27 (1.12) ± 0.78 for the standard CloudSat radar?visible optical depth algorithm for Ze > ?28 dBZe. The ratios for the groups employing the lidar?radar approach and the radar?visible optical depth algorithm may be lower by as much as 25% because of uncertainties in the extinction in small ice particles provided to the groups. Retrievals from future spaceborne radar using reflectivity?Doppler fall speeds show considerable promise. A lidar?radar approach, as applied to measurements from CALIPSO and CloudSat, is useful only in a narrow range of ice water paths (IWP) (40 < IWP < 100 g m?2). Because of the use of the Rayleigh approximation at high reflectivities in some of the algorithms and differences in the way nonspherical particles and Mie effects are considered, IWC retrievals in regions of radar reflectivity at 94 GHz exceeding about 5 dBZe are subject to uncertainties of ±50%.
publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
titleTesting IWC Retrieval Methods Using Radar and Ancillary Measurements with In Situ Data
typeJournal Paper
journal volume47
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
identifier doi10.1175/2007JAMC1606.1
journal fristpage135
journal lastpage163
treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2008:;volume( 047 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record