Coastal Orographic Rainfall Processes Observed by Radar during the California Land-Falling Jets ExperimentSource: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2003:;Volume( 004 ):;issue: 002::page 264Author:White, Allen B.
,
Neiman, Paul J.
,
Ralph, F. Martin
,
Kingsmill, David E.
,
Persson, P. Ola G.
DOI: 10.1175/1525-7541(2003)4<264:CORPOB>2.0.CO;2Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Radar and rain gauge observations collected in coastal mountains during the California Land-Falling Jets Experiment (CALJET) are used to diagnose the bulk physical properties of rainfall during a wet winter season (January?March 1998). Three rainfall types were clearly distinguishable by differences in their vertical profiles of radar reflectivity and Doppler vertical velocity: nonbright band, bright band, and hybrid (seeder?feeder). The contribution of each rainfall type to the total rainfall observed at the radar site (1841 mm) was determined by a new, objective algorithm. While hybrid rain occurred most often, nonbrightband rain (NBB rain) contributed significantly (28%) to the total. This paper focuses on characterizing NBB rain because of the need to document this key physical process and because of its impact on Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) precipitation surveillance capabilities. NBB rain is a quasi-steady, shallow rain process that does not exhibit a radar bright band, that occurs largely beneath the melting level, and that can produce rain rates exceeding 20 mm h?1. Composite vertical profiles were produced for NBB rain using 1417 samples and brightband rain using 5061 samples. Although the mean rain rate for each composite was 3.95 mm h?1, at all altitudes NBB rain had systematically weaker equivalent radar reflectivity (e.g., 20.5 dBZe vs 28.5 dBZe at 263 m above ground level) and much smaller Doppler vertical fall velocities (e.g., 2.25 m s?1 vs 6.25 m s?1 at 263 m) than did brightband rain. The reflectivity?rain-rate (Z?R) relationship for NBB rain (Z = 1.2R1.8) differs significantly from that of brightband/hybrid rain (Z = 207R1.1). The meteorological context in which NBB rain occurred is described through case studies and seasonal statistics. NBB rain occurred in a wide variety of positions relative to frontal zones within land-falling storms, but three-quarters of it fell when the layer-mean, profiler-observed wind direction at 1250 m MSL (the altitude of the composite low-level jet) was between 190° and 220°. The importance of orographic forcing during NBB rain, relative to all rain events, was indicated by a stronger correlation between upslope wind speed and coastal rain rates at 1250 m MSL (r = 0.74 vs r = 0.54), stronger low-level wind speeds, and wind directions more orthogonal to the mean terrain orientation.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | White, Allen B. | |
contributor author | Neiman, Paul J. | |
contributor author | Ralph, F. Martin | |
contributor author | Kingsmill, David E. | |
contributor author | Persson, P. Ola G. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:17:32Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:17:32Z | |
date copyright | 2003/04/01 | |
date issued | 2003 | |
identifier issn | 1525-755X | |
identifier other | ams-65136.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206328 | |
description abstract | Radar and rain gauge observations collected in coastal mountains during the California Land-Falling Jets Experiment (CALJET) are used to diagnose the bulk physical properties of rainfall during a wet winter season (January?March 1998). Three rainfall types were clearly distinguishable by differences in their vertical profiles of radar reflectivity and Doppler vertical velocity: nonbright band, bright band, and hybrid (seeder?feeder). The contribution of each rainfall type to the total rainfall observed at the radar site (1841 mm) was determined by a new, objective algorithm. While hybrid rain occurred most often, nonbrightband rain (NBB rain) contributed significantly (28%) to the total. This paper focuses on characterizing NBB rain because of the need to document this key physical process and because of its impact on Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) precipitation surveillance capabilities. NBB rain is a quasi-steady, shallow rain process that does not exhibit a radar bright band, that occurs largely beneath the melting level, and that can produce rain rates exceeding 20 mm h?1. Composite vertical profiles were produced for NBB rain using 1417 samples and brightband rain using 5061 samples. Although the mean rain rate for each composite was 3.95 mm h?1, at all altitudes NBB rain had systematically weaker equivalent radar reflectivity (e.g., 20.5 dBZe vs 28.5 dBZe at 263 m above ground level) and much smaller Doppler vertical fall velocities (e.g., 2.25 m s?1 vs 6.25 m s?1 at 263 m) than did brightband rain. The reflectivity?rain-rate (Z?R) relationship for NBB rain (Z = 1.2R1.8) differs significantly from that of brightband/hybrid rain (Z = 207R1.1). The meteorological context in which NBB rain occurred is described through case studies and seasonal statistics. NBB rain occurred in a wide variety of positions relative to frontal zones within land-falling storms, but three-quarters of it fell when the layer-mean, profiler-observed wind direction at 1250 m MSL (the altitude of the composite low-level jet) was between 190° and 220°. The importance of orographic forcing during NBB rain, relative to all rain events, was indicated by a stronger correlation between upslope wind speed and coastal rain rates at 1250 m MSL (r = 0.74 vs r = 0.54), stronger low-level wind speeds, and wind directions more orthogonal to the mean terrain orientation. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Coastal Orographic Rainfall Processes Observed by Radar during the California Land-Falling Jets Experiment | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 4 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Hydrometeorology | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1525-7541(2003)4<264:CORPOB>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 264 | |
journal lastpage | 282 | |
tree | Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2003:;Volume( 004 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |