YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Estimates of Freshwater Discharge from Continents: Latitudinal and Seasonal Variations

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2002:;Volume( 003 ):;issue: 006::page 660
    Author:
    Dai, Aiguo
    ,
    Trenberth, Kevin E.
    DOI: 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0660:EOFDFC>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Annual and monthly mean values of continental freshwater discharge into the oceans are estimated at 1° resolution using several methods. The most accurate estimate is based on streamflow data from the world's largest 921 rivers, supplemented with estimates of discharge from unmonitored areas based on the ratios of runoff and drainage area between the unmonitored and monitored regions. Simulations using a river transport model (RTM) forced by a runoff field were used to derive the river mouth outflow from the farthest downstream gauge records. Separate estimates are also made using RTM simulations forced by three different runoff fields: 1) based on observed streamflow and a water balance model, and from estimates of precipitation P minus evaporation E computed as residuals from the atmospheric moisture budget using atmospheric reanalyses from 2) the National Centers for Environmental Prediction?National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP?NCAR) and 3) the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Compared with previous estimates, improvements are made in extending observed discharge downstream to the river mouth, in accounting for the unmonitored streamflow, in discharging runoff at correct locations, and in providing an annual cycle of continental discharge. The use of river mouth outflow increases the global continental discharge by ?19% compared with unadjusted streamflow from the farthest downstream stations. The river-based estimate of global continental discharge presented here is 37?288 ± 662 km3 yr?1, which is ?7.6% of global P or 35% of terrestrial P. While this number is comparable to earlier estimates, its partitioning into individual oceans and its latitudinal distribution differ from earlier studies. The peak discharges into the Arctic, the Pacific, and global oceans occur in June, versus May for the Atlantic and August for the Indian Oceans. Snow accumulation and melt are shown to have large effects on the annual cycle of discharge into all ocean basins except for the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean and Black Seas. The discharge and its latitudinal distribution implied by the observation-based runoff and the ECMWF reanalysis-based P?E agree well with the river-based estimates, whereas the discharge implied by the NCEP?NCAR reanalysis-based P?E has a negative bias.
    • Download: (1.259Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Estimates of Freshwater Discharge from Continents: Latitudinal and Seasonal Variations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4206242
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDai, Aiguo
    contributor authorTrenberth, Kevin E.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:17:18Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:17:18Z
    date copyright2002/12/01
    date issued2002
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-65059.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206242
    description abstractAnnual and monthly mean values of continental freshwater discharge into the oceans are estimated at 1° resolution using several methods. The most accurate estimate is based on streamflow data from the world's largest 921 rivers, supplemented with estimates of discharge from unmonitored areas based on the ratios of runoff and drainage area between the unmonitored and monitored regions. Simulations using a river transport model (RTM) forced by a runoff field were used to derive the river mouth outflow from the farthest downstream gauge records. Separate estimates are also made using RTM simulations forced by three different runoff fields: 1) based on observed streamflow and a water balance model, and from estimates of precipitation P minus evaporation E computed as residuals from the atmospheric moisture budget using atmospheric reanalyses from 2) the National Centers for Environmental Prediction?National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP?NCAR) and 3) the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). Compared with previous estimates, improvements are made in extending observed discharge downstream to the river mouth, in accounting for the unmonitored streamflow, in discharging runoff at correct locations, and in providing an annual cycle of continental discharge. The use of river mouth outflow increases the global continental discharge by ?19% compared with unadjusted streamflow from the farthest downstream stations. The river-based estimate of global continental discharge presented here is 37?288 ± 662 km3 yr?1, which is ?7.6% of global P or 35% of terrestrial P. While this number is comparable to earlier estimates, its partitioning into individual oceans and its latitudinal distribution differ from earlier studies. The peak discharges into the Arctic, the Pacific, and global oceans occur in June, versus May for the Atlantic and August for the Indian Oceans. Snow accumulation and melt are shown to have large effects on the annual cycle of discharge into all ocean basins except for the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean and Black Seas. The discharge and its latitudinal distribution implied by the observation-based runoff and the ECMWF reanalysis-based P?E agree well with the river-based estimates, whereas the discharge implied by the NCEP?NCAR reanalysis-based P?E has a negative bias.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEstimates of Freshwater Discharge from Continents: Latitudinal and Seasonal Variations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume3
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0660:EOFDFC>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage660
    journal lastpage687
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2002:;Volume( 003 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian