YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Representation of Snow in Land Surface Schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d)

    Source: Journal of Hydrometeorology:;2001:;Volume( 002 ):;issue: 001::page 7
    Author:
    Slater, A. G.
    ,
    Schlosser, C. A.
    ,
    Desborough, C. E.
    ,
    Pitman, A. J.
    ,
    Henderson-Sellers, A.
    ,
    Robock, A.
    ,
    Vinnikov, K. Ya
    ,
    Entin, J.
    ,
    Mitchell, K.
    ,
    Chen, F.
    ,
    Boone, A.
    ,
    Etchevers, P.
    ,
    Habets, F.
    ,
    Noilhan, J.
    ,
    Braden, H.
    ,
    Cox, P. M.
    ,
    de Rosnay, P.
    ,
    Dickinson, R. E.
    ,
    Yang, Z-L.
    ,
    Dai, Y-J.
    ,
    Zeng, Q.
    ,
    Duan, Q.
    ,
    Koren, V.
    ,
    Schaake, S.
    ,
    Gedney, N.
    ,
    Gusev, Ye M.
    ,
    Nasonova, O. N.
    ,
    Kim, J.
    ,
    Kowalczyk, E. A.
    ,
    Shmakin, A. B.
    ,
    Smirnova, T. G.
    ,
    Verseghy, D.
    ,
    Wetzel, P.
    ,
    Xue, Y.
    DOI: 10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0007:TROSIL>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Twenty-one land surface schemes (LSSs) performed simulations forced by 18 yr of observed meteorological data from a grassland catchment at Valdai, Russia, as part of the Project for the Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) Phase 2(d). In this paper the authors examine the simulation of snow. In comparison with observations, the models are able to capture the broad features of the snow regime on both an intra- and interannual basis. However, weaknesses in the simulations exist, and early season ablation events are a significant source of model scatter. Over the 18-yr simulation, systematic differences between the models? snow simulations are evident and reveal specific aspects of snow model parameterization and design as being responsible. Vapor exchange at the snow surface varies widely among the models, ranging from a large net loss to a small net source for the snow season. Snow albedo, fractional snow cover, and their interplay have a large effect on energy available for ablation, with differences among models most evident at low snow depths. The incorporation of the snowpack within an LSS structure affects the method by which snow accesses, as well as utilizes, available energy for ablation. The sensitivity of some models to longwave radiation, the dominant winter radiative flux, is partly due to a stability-induced feedback and the differing abilities of models to exchange turbulent energy with the atmosphere. Results presented in this paper suggest where weaknesses in macroscale snow modeling lie and where both theoretical and observational work should be focused to address these weaknesses.
    • Download: (623.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Representation of Snow in Land Surface Schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d)

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4206149
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrometeorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSlater, A. G.
    contributor authorSchlosser, C. A.
    contributor authorDesborough, C. E.
    contributor authorPitman, A. J.
    contributor authorHenderson-Sellers, A.
    contributor authorRobock, A.
    contributor authorVinnikov, K. Ya
    contributor authorEntin, J.
    contributor authorMitchell, K.
    contributor authorChen, F.
    contributor authorBoone, A.
    contributor authorEtchevers, P.
    contributor authorHabets, F.
    contributor authorNoilhan, J.
    contributor authorBraden, H.
    contributor authorCox, P. M.
    contributor authorde Rosnay, P.
    contributor authorDickinson, R. E.
    contributor authorYang, Z-L.
    contributor authorDai, Y-J.
    contributor authorZeng, Q.
    contributor authorDuan, Q.
    contributor authorKoren, V.
    contributor authorSchaake, S.
    contributor authorGedney, N.
    contributor authorGusev, Ye M.
    contributor authorNasonova, O. N.
    contributor authorKim, J.
    contributor authorKowalczyk, E. A.
    contributor authorShmakin, A. B.
    contributor authorSmirnova, T. G.
    contributor authorVerseghy, D.
    contributor authorWetzel, P.
    contributor authorXue, Y.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:17:04Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:17:04Z
    date copyright2001/02/01
    date issued2001
    identifier issn1525-755X
    identifier otherams-64976.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4206149
    description abstractTwenty-one land surface schemes (LSSs) performed simulations forced by 18 yr of observed meteorological data from a grassland catchment at Valdai, Russia, as part of the Project for the Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) Phase 2(d). In this paper the authors examine the simulation of snow. In comparison with observations, the models are able to capture the broad features of the snow regime on both an intra- and interannual basis. However, weaknesses in the simulations exist, and early season ablation events are a significant source of model scatter. Over the 18-yr simulation, systematic differences between the models? snow simulations are evident and reveal specific aspects of snow model parameterization and design as being responsible. Vapor exchange at the snow surface varies widely among the models, ranging from a large net loss to a small net source for the snow season. Snow albedo, fractional snow cover, and their interplay have a large effect on energy available for ablation, with differences among models most evident at low snow depths. The incorporation of the snowpack within an LSS structure affects the method by which snow accesses, as well as utilizes, available energy for ablation. The sensitivity of some models to longwave radiation, the dominant winter radiative flux, is partly due to a stability-induced feedback and the differing abilities of models to exchange turbulent energy with the atmosphere. Results presented in this paper suggest where weaknesses in macroscale snow modeling lie and where both theoretical and observational work should be focused to address these weaknesses.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe Representation of Snow in Land Surface Schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d)
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume2
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Hydrometeorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1525-7541(2001)002<0007:TROSIL>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage7
    journal lastpage25
    treeJournal of Hydrometeorology:;2001:;Volume( 002 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian