contributor author | Dee, Dick P. | |
contributor author | da Silva, Arlindo M. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:14:45Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:14:45Z | |
date copyright | 2003/01/01 | |
date issued | 2003 | |
identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
identifier other | ams-64063.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4205136 | |
description abstract | The implications of using different control variables for the analysis of moisture observations in a global atmospheric data assimilation system are investigated. A moisture analysis based on either mixing ratio or specific humidity is prone to large extrapolation errors, due to the high variability in space and time of these parameters and to the difficulties in modeling their error covariances. Using the logarithm of specific humidity does not alleviate these problems, and has the further disadvantage that very dry background estimates cannot be effectively corrected by observations. Relative humidity is a better choice from a statistical point of view, because this field is spatially and temporally more coherent and error statistics are therefore easier to obtain. If, however, the analysis is designed to preserve relative humidity in the absence of moisture observations, then the analyzed specific humidity field depends entirely on analyzed temperature changes. If the model has a cool bias in the stratosphere this will lead to an unstable accumulation of excess moisture there. A pseudo-relative humidity can be defined by scaling the mixing ratio by the background saturation mixing ratio. A univariate pseudo-relative humidity analysis will preserve the specific humidity field in the absence of moisture observations. A pseudo-relative humidity analysis is shown to be equivalent to a mixing ratio analysis with flow-dependent variance specifications. In the presence of multivariate (temperature?moisture) observations it produces analyzed relative humidity values that are nearly identical to those produced by a relative humidity analysis. Based on a time series analysis of radiosonde observed-minus-background differences it appears to be more justifiable to neglect specific humidity?temperature correlations (in a univariate pseudo-relative humidity analysis) than to neglect relative humidity?temperature correlations (in a univariate relative humidity analysis). A pseudo-relative humidity analysis can be implemented in an existing moisture analysis system simply by scaling the observed-minus-background residuals prior to solving the analysis equation, and rescaling the analyzed increments afterward. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | The Choice of Variable for Atmospheric Moisture Analysis | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 131 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0155:TCOVFA>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 155 | |
journal lastpage | 171 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2003:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |