An Explicit Simulation of Tropical Cyclones with a Triply Nested Movable Mesh Primitive Equation Model: TCM3. Part II: Model Refinements and Sensitivity to Cloud Microphysics ParameterizationSource: Monthly Weather Review:;2002:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 012::page 3022Author:Wang, Yuqing
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<3022:AESOTC>2.0.CO;2Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: It has been long known that cloud microphysics can have a significant impact on the simulations of precipitation; however, there have been few studies so far that have investigated the effect of cloud microphysics on tropical cyclones. In the most advanced simulation of tropical cyclones by numerical models, the use of explicit cloud microphysics becomes more and more attractive with cumulus parameterization bypassed at very high resolutions. In this study, the sensitivity of the simulated tropical cyclone structure and intensity to the choice and details of cloud microphysics parameterization is investigated using the triply nested movable mesh tropical cyclone model TCM3 described in Part I but with several refinements. Three different cloud microphysics parameterization schemes are tested, including the warm-rain-only cloud microphysics scheme (WMRN) and two mixed-ice-phase cloud microphysics schemes, one of which has three ice species (cloud ice?snow?graupel; CTRL) while the other has hail instead of graupel (HAIL). It is shown that, although the cloud structures of the simulated tropical cyclone can be quite different with different cloud microphysics schemes, intensification rate and final intensity are not very sensitive to the details of the cloud microphysics parameterizations. This occurs because all of the schemes produce similar vertical heating profiles and similar levels of rainbands, stratiform clouds, and downdrafts. The latter are found to be prohibitive factors to tropical cyclone intensification and intensity. Both evaporation of rain and melting of snow and graupel are responsible for the generation of downdrafts and rainbands. This is demonstrated using two extra experiments in which the evaporation of rain and melting of snow and graupel are removed from WMRN or CTRL experiments. In these two extreme cases, neither significant rainbands nor downdrafts were generated. As a result, the storm developed much more rapidly and reached an intensity that was much stronger than those in the experiments with both evaporation of rain and melting of ice species. In comparison with the substantial sensitivity of simulated tropical cyclones to different cumulus parameterization schemes found in previous studies, the weak sensitivity of the simulated tropical cyclone intensity to cloud microphysics parameterizations from this study indicates the potential advantage in using explicit cloud microphysics in tropical cyclone models to improve the intensity forecasting.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Wang, Yuqing | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:14:42Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:14:42Z | |
date copyright | 2002/12/01 | |
date issued | 2002 | |
identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
identifier other | ams-64047.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4205118 | |
description abstract | It has been long known that cloud microphysics can have a significant impact on the simulations of precipitation; however, there have been few studies so far that have investigated the effect of cloud microphysics on tropical cyclones. In the most advanced simulation of tropical cyclones by numerical models, the use of explicit cloud microphysics becomes more and more attractive with cumulus parameterization bypassed at very high resolutions. In this study, the sensitivity of the simulated tropical cyclone structure and intensity to the choice and details of cloud microphysics parameterization is investigated using the triply nested movable mesh tropical cyclone model TCM3 described in Part I but with several refinements. Three different cloud microphysics parameterization schemes are tested, including the warm-rain-only cloud microphysics scheme (WMRN) and two mixed-ice-phase cloud microphysics schemes, one of which has three ice species (cloud ice?snow?graupel; CTRL) while the other has hail instead of graupel (HAIL). It is shown that, although the cloud structures of the simulated tropical cyclone can be quite different with different cloud microphysics schemes, intensification rate and final intensity are not very sensitive to the details of the cloud microphysics parameterizations. This occurs because all of the schemes produce similar vertical heating profiles and similar levels of rainbands, stratiform clouds, and downdrafts. The latter are found to be prohibitive factors to tropical cyclone intensification and intensity. Both evaporation of rain and melting of snow and graupel are responsible for the generation of downdrafts and rainbands. This is demonstrated using two extra experiments in which the evaporation of rain and melting of snow and graupel are removed from WMRN or CTRL experiments. In these two extreme cases, neither significant rainbands nor downdrafts were generated. As a result, the storm developed much more rapidly and reached an intensity that was much stronger than those in the experiments with both evaporation of rain and melting of ice species. In comparison with the substantial sensitivity of simulated tropical cyclones to different cumulus parameterization schemes found in previous studies, the weak sensitivity of the simulated tropical cyclone intensity to cloud microphysics parameterizations from this study indicates the potential advantage in using explicit cloud microphysics in tropical cyclone models to improve the intensity forecasting. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | An Explicit Simulation of Tropical Cyclones with a Triply Nested Movable Mesh Primitive Equation Model: TCM3. Part II: Model Refinements and Sensitivity to Cloud Microphysics Parameterization | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 130 | |
journal issue | 12 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<3022:AESOTC>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 3022 | |
journal lastpage | 3036 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;2002:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 012 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |