YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Accounting for Model Error in Ensemble-Based State Estimation and Forecasting

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2002:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 010::page 2373
    Author:
    Hansen, James A.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2373:AFMEIE>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Accurate forecasts require accurate initial conditions. For systems of interest, even given a perfect model and an infinitely long time series of observations, it is impossible to determine a system's exact initial state. This motivates a probabilistic approach to both state estimation and forecasting. Two approaches to probabilistic state estimation, the ensemble Kalman filter, and a probabilistic approach to 4DVAR are compared in the perfect model framework using a two-dimensional chaotic map. Probabilistic forecasts are fed back into the probabilistic state estimation routines in the form of background weighting information. It is found that both approaches are capable of producing correct probabilistic forecasts when a perfect model is in hand, but the probabilistic approach to 4DVAR appears to be the least sensitive to nonlinearities. When only imperfect models are available (i.e., always), one does not have access to the distribution that produces truth, and it is therefore impossible to produce a correct probabilistic forecast. A multimodel approach to ensemble forecasting provides an opportunity to generate ensembles that systematically bound the true system state. Results suggest that a beneficial approach to ensemble construction is to produce multimodel ensemble members that lie on their respective model attractors, and to select model attractors that systematically bound the system attractor. The inclusion of multimodel uncertainty information in ensemble Kalman filter?like approaches allows ensemble members to be drawn off their respective model attractors, while the dynamical constraints intrinsic to probabilistic 4DVAR enables the approach to ignore ensemble spread due to model differences and to produce analyses that remain on their respective model attractors. Rather than implying that probabilistic 4DVAR is the preferred technique for multimodel data assimilation, these results suggest that it is best to ignore multimodel information during data assimilation, either implicitly (e.g., probabilistic 4DVAR) or explicitly (e.g., the ?poor man's ensemble?).
    • Download: (1.081Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Accounting for Model Error in Ensemble-Based State Estimation and Forecasting

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4205077
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHansen, James A.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:14:36Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:14:36Z
    date copyright2002/10/01
    date issued2002
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-64010.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4205077
    description abstractAccurate forecasts require accurate initial conditions. For systems of interest, even given a perfect model and an infinitely long time series of observations, it is impossible to determine a system's exact initial state. This motivates a probabilistic approach to both state estimation and forecasting. Two approaches to probabilistic state estimation, the ensemble Kalman filter, and a probabilistic approach to 4DVAR are compared in the perfect model framework using a two-dimensional chaotic map. Probabilistic forecasts are fed back into the probabilistic state estimation routines in the form of background weighting information. It is found that both approaches are capable of producing correct probabilistic forecasts when a perfect model is in hand, but the probabilistic approach to 4DVAR appears to be the least sensitive to nonlinearities. When only imperfect models are available (i.e., always), one does not have access to the distribution that produces truth, and it is therefore impossible to produce a correct probabilistic forecast. A multimodel approach to ensemble forecasting provides an opportunity to generate ensembles that systematically bound the true system state. Results suggest that a beneficial approach to ensemble construction is to produce multimodel ensemble members that lie on their respective model attractors, and to select model attractors that systematically bound the system attractor. The inclusion of multimodel uncertainty information in ensemble Kalman filter?like approaches allows ensemble members to be drawn off their respective model attractors, while the dynamical constraints intrinsic to probabilistic 4DVAR enables the approach to ignore ensemble spread due to model differences and to produce analyses that remain on their respective model attractors. Rather than implying that probabilistic 4DVAR is the preferred technique for multimodel data assimilation, these results suggest that it is best to ignore multimodel information during data assimilation, either implicitly (e.g., probabilistic 4DVAR) or explicitly (e.g., the ?poor man's ensemble?).
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAccounting for Model Error in Ensemble-Based State Estimation and Forecasting
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue10
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2373:AFMEIE>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2373
    journal lastpage2391
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2002:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian