YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Flight-Level Thermodynamic Instrument Wetting Errors in Hurricanes. Part I: Observations

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2002:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 004::page 825
    Author:
    Eastin, Matthew D.
    ,
    Black, Peter G.
    ,
    Gray, William M.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<0825:FLTIWE>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Flight-level thermodynamic errors caused by the wetting of temperature and moisture sensors immersed within the airstream are studied using data from 666 radial legs collected in 31 hurricanes at pressure levels ranging from 850 to 500 mb. Concurrent measurements from a modified Barnes radiometer and a Rosemount 102 immersion thermometer are compared to identify regions, called instrument wetting events (IWE), in which Rosemount temperatures are significantly cooler than radiometer-derived temperatures by a specified amount. A total of 420 IWE are identified in the dataset. Roughly 50% of the radial legs contain at least one instrument wetting event. More than 90% of IWE are associated with updrafts containing cloud water and are confined to scales less than 10 km. IWE are also found to be more frequent in eyewalls and intense hurricanes. Thermodynamic errors within IWE and convective updrafts and downdrafts are summarized as distributions of average temperature, specific humidity, virtual potential temperature, and equivalent potential temperature error. Distributions are skewed toward larger error values at all levels. Median average errors within IWE indicate that the thermodynamic quantities are typically too low by ?1°C, ?1 g kg?1, ?1.5 K, and ?5 K, respectively. The largest errors (>90% of the distribution) are nearly twice the median values. Error magnitudes tend to increase with height, but rarely achieve theoretical predictions. In addition, more than 65% of updrafts and 35% of downdrafts are found to contain significant thermodynamic errors. A correction method used in earlier studies was found to be inadequate at removing the majority of errors, but reduced the errors by ?30%?50% on average.
    • Download: (295.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Flight-Level Thermodynamic Instrument Wetting Errors in Hurricanes. Part I: Observations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4204972
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorEastin, Matthew D.
    contributor authorBlack, Peter G.
    contributor authorGray, William M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:14:16Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:14:16Z
    date copyright2002/04/01
    date issued2002
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-63916.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4204972
    description abstractFlight-level thermodynamic errors caused by the wetting of temperature and moisture sensors immersed within the airstream are studied using data from 666 radial legs collected in 31 hurricanes at pressure levels ranging from 850 to 500 mb. Concurrent measurements from a modified Barnes radiometer and a Rosemount 102 immersion thermometer are compared to identify regions, called instrument wetting events (IWE), in which Rosemount temperatures are significantly cooler than radiometer-derived temperatures by a specified amount. A total of 420 IWE are identified in the dataset. Roughly 50% of the radial legs contain at least one instrument wetting event. More than 90% of IWE are associated with updrafts containing cloud water and are confined to scales less than 10 km. IWE are also found to be more frequent in eyewalls and intense hurricanes. Thermodynamic errors within IWE and convective updrafts and downdrafts are summarized as distributions of average temperature, specific humidity, virtual potential temperature, and equivalent potential temperature error. Distributions are skewed toward larger error values at all levels. Median average errors within IWE indicate that the thermodynamic quantities are typically too low by ?1°C, ?1 g kg?1, ?1.5 K, and ?5 K, respectively. The largest errors (>90% of the distribution) are nearly twice the median values. Error magnitudes tend to increase with height, but rarely achieve theoretical predictions. In addition, more than 65% of updrafts and 35% of downdrafts are found to contain significant thermodynamic errors. A correction method used in earlier studies was found to be inadequate at removing the majority of errors, but reduced the errors by ?30%?50% on average.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleFlight-Level Thermodynamic Instrument Wetting Errors in Hurricanes. Part I: Observations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue4
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<0825:FLTIWE>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage825
    journal lastpage841
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2002:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian