YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Relationship between Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Polarity and Surface Equivalent Potential Temperature during Three Tornadic Outbreaks

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2000:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 009::page 3320
    Author:
    Smith, Stephan B.
    ,
    LaDue, James G.
    ,
    MacGorman, Donald R.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3320:TRBCTG>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The relationship between cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning polarity and surface equivalent potential temperature (?e) is examined for the 26 April 1991, Andover?Wichita, Kansas; the 13 March 1990, Hesston, Kansas; and the 28 August 1990, Plainfield, Illinois, tornadic storm events. The majority of thunderstorms whose CG lightning activity was dominated by negative flashes (labeled negative storms) formed in regions of weak ?e gradient and downstream of a ?e maximum. The majority of thunderstorms whose initial CG lightning activity was dominated by positive flashes formed in regions of strong ?e gradient, upstream of a ?e maximum. Some of these storms moved adjacent to the ?e maximum and were dominated by positive CG lightning throughout their lifetimes (labeled ?positive storms?). The other initially positive storms moved through the ?e maximum where their updrafts appeared to undergo intensification. The storms? dominant CG polarity switched from positive to negative after they crossed the ?e maximum (labeled reversal storms). Summary statistics based on this storm classification show that all the reversal storms examined for these three events were severe and half of them produced tornadoes of F3?F5 intensity. By comparison, only 58% of the negative storms produced severe weather and only 10% produced tornadoes of F3?F5 intensity. It is suggested that the CG lightning reversal process may be initiated by rapid updraft intensification brought about by an increase in the buoyancy of low-level inflow air as initially positive storms pass through mesoscale regions of high ?e. As these storms move out of a ?e maximum, massive precipitation fallout may occur when their updrafts weaken and can no longer support the mass of liquid water and ice aloft. The fallout may in turn cause a major redistribution of the electrical charge within the storm resulting in polarity reversal and/or downdraft-induced tornadogenesis.
    • Download: (545.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Relationship between Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Polarity and Surface Equivalent Potential Temperature during Three Tornadic Outbreaks

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4204637
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSmith, Stephan B.
    contributor authorLaDue, James G.
    contributor authorMacGorman, Donald R.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:13:22Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:13:22Z
    date copyright2000/09/01
    date issued2000
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-63614.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4204637
    description abstractThe relationship between cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning polarity and surface equivalent potential temperature (?e) is examined for the 26 April 1991, Andover?Wichita, Kansas; the 13 March 1990, Hesston, Kansas; and the 28 August 1990, Plainfield, Illinois, tornadic storm events. The majority of thunderstorms whose CG lightning activity was dominated by negative flashes (labeled negative storms) formed in regions of weak ?e gradient and downstream of a ?e maximum. The majority of thunderstorms whose initial CG lightning activity was dominated by positive flashes formed in regions of strong ?e gradient, upstream of a ?e maximum. Some of these storms moved adjacent to the ?e maximum and were dominated by positive CG lightning throughout their lifetimes (labeled ?positive storms?). The other initially positive storms moved through the ?e maximum where their updrafts appeared to undergo intensification. The storms? dominant CG polarity switched from positive to negative after they crossed the ?e maximum (labeled reversal storms). Summary statistics based on this storm classification show that all the reversal storms examined for these three events were severe and half of them produced tornadoes of F3?F5 intensity. By comparison, only 58% of the negative storms produced severe weather and only 10% produced tornadoes of F3?F5 intensity. It is suggested that the CG lightning reversal process may be initiated by rapid updraft intensification brought about by an increase in the buoyancy of low-level inflow air as initially positive storms pass through mesoscale regions of high ?e. As these storms move out of a ?e maximum, massive precipitation fallout may occur when their updrafts weaken and can no longer support the mass of liquid water and ice aloft. The fallout may in turn cause a major redistribution of the electrical charge within the storm resulting in polarity reversal and/or downdraft-induced tornadogenesis.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe Relationship between Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Polarity and Surface Equivalent Potential Temperature during Three Tornadic Outbreaks
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume128
    journal issue9
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3320:TRBCTG>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage3320
    journal lastpage3328
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2000:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian