YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Further Studies of the Optimization of a Hurricane Track Prediction Model Using the Adjoint Equations

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1999:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 007::page 1586
    Author:
    Jones, Robert W.
    ,
    DeMaria, Mark
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1586:FSOTOO>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The method of model fitting, or adjoint method, is applied to a barotropic hurricane track forecast model described by DeMaria and Jones using a large sample of forecast cases. The sample includes all Atlantic tropical cyclones that reached hurricane intensity during the 1989?93 hurricane seasons (141 72-h forecasts of 17 storms). The cases considered by DeMaria and Jones are a subset of the present sample. Model-fitting calculations using strong, weak, strong followed by weak, or weak followed by strong model constraints are discussed for data assimilation periods varying from 6 to 72 h. Generally, the best track forecasts occur for shorter assimilation periods and for weak constraints, although only the 12-h assimilation with the weak constraint has less track error than the control forecast without assimilation, and only for the 12-h forecast. The principle reason for this lack of improvement is that the fit of the model to the observed track is good at the middle of the assimilation period, but not very good at the end where the forecast begins. When a future track position at 6 h is included in the assimilation, in order to improve the track fit at the synoptic data time, the resulting track errors average about 10% smaller than the control forecast. The control forecast may also be improved in the same way. In that case, the best assimilation forecasts have 2.5% smaller track errors than the modified control forecasts.
    • Download: (123.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Further Studies of the Optimization of a Hurricane Track Prediction Model Using the Adjoint Equations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4204321
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJones, Robert W.
    contributor authorDeMaria, Mark
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:12:29Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:12:29Z
    date copyright1999/07/01
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-63330.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4204321
    description abstractThe method of model fitting, or adjoint method, is applied to a barotropic hurricane track forecast model described by DeMaria and Jones using a large sample of forecast cases. The sample includes all Atlantic tropical cyclones that reached hurricane intensity during the 1989?93 hurricane seasons (141 72-h forecasts of 17 storms). The cases considered by DeMaria and Jones are a subset of the present sample. Model-fitting calculations using strong, weak, strong followed by weak, or weak followed by strong model constraints are discussed for data assimilation periods varying from 6 to 72 h. Generally, the best track forecasts occur for shorter assimilation periods and for weak constraints, although only the 12-h assimilation with the weak constraint has less track error than the control forecast without assimilation, and only for the 12-h forecast. The principle reason for this lack of improvement is that the fit of the model to the observed track is good at the middle of the assimilation period, but not very good at the end where the forecast begins. When a future track position at 6 h is included in the assimilation, in order to improve the track fit at the synoptic data time, the resulting track errors average about 10% smaller than the control forecast. The control forecast may also be improved in the same way. In that case, the best assimilation forecasts have 2.5% smaller track errors than the modified control forecasts.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleFurther Studies of the Optimization of a Hurricane Track Prediction Model Using the Adjoint Equations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume127
    journal issue7
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1586:FSOTOO>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1586
    journal lastpage1598
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1999:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian