YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Generalization of Using an Adjoint Model in Intermittent Data Assimilation Systems

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1999:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 005::page 766
    Author:
    Huang, Xiang-Yu
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<0766:AGOUAA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A generalized setup is proposed for the poor man?s 4D variational data assimilation system (PMV) of Huang et al. The new scheme is referred to as a generalization of PMV (GPV) and has the same basic idea as that of PMV, that is, to use an adjoint model to improve an optimum interpolation (OI)?based assimilation system. In addition, GPV includes the possibility of using different forecast models in the original OI-based assimilation system and in the variational component of the scheme. This generalization leads to three advantages over the original setup: 1) a wider application of an adjoint model developed for a particular forecast model; 2) an implementation flexibility due to its incremental nature; 3) considerable CPU savings when the variational component is run on low resolutions. A detailed comparison is made between GPV and PMV. The steps of a practical implementation are also given. A 5-day period characterized by intense cyclone development is chosen for testing different data assimilation schemes. Experiments with GPV using a low-resolution variational component based on different model formulations indicate that the proposed scheme GPV, as its predecessor PMV, also leads to better first guess fields, smaller analysis increments, modified baroclinic structures in the final analyses, and improved forecasts. The differences between the GPV analyses and the original OI-based analyses are mainly in the data-sparse area and are related to baroclinic processes.
    • Download: (827.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Generalization of Using an Adjoint Model in Intermittent Data Assimilation Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4204264
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHuang, Xiang-Yu
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:12:21Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:12:21Z
    date copyright1999/05/01
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-63279.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4204264
    description abstractA generalized setup is proposed for the poor man?s 4D variational data assimilation system (PMV) of Huang et al. The new scheme is referred to as a generalization of PMV (GPV) and has the same basic idea as that of PMV, that is, to use an adjoint model to improve an optimum interpolation (OI)?based assimilation system. In addition, GPV includes the possibility of using different forecast models in the original OI-based assimilation system and in the variational component of the scheme. This generalization leads to three advantages over the original setup: 1) a wider application of an adjoint model developed for a particular forecast model; 2) an implementation flexibility due to its incremental nature; 3) considerable CPU savings when the variational component is run on low resolutions. A detailed comparison is made between GPV and PMV. The steps of a practical implementation are also given. A 5-day period characterized by intense cyclone development is chosen for testing different data assimilation schemes. Experiments with GPV using a low-resolution variational component based on different model formulations indicate that the proposed scheme GPV, as its predecessor PMV, also leads to better first guess fields, smaller analysis increments, modified baroclinic structures in the final analyses, and improved forecasts. The differences between the GPV analyses and the original OI-based analyses are mainly in the data-sparse area and are related to baroclinic processes.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Generalization of Using an Adjoint Model in Intermittent Data Assimilation Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume127
    journal issue5
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<0766:AGOUAA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage766
    journal lastpage787
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1999:;volume( 127 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian