Vorticity Equation Terms for Extratropical CyclonesSource: Monthly Weather Review:;1996:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 012::page 2843Author:Grotjahn, Richard
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2843:VETFEC>2.0.CO;2Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: All terms of the frictionless, nonlinear, vorticity equation are examined. Traditional scale analysis provides one of several justifications for using the quasigeostrophic (QG) system of equations to model extratropical cyclones. Analysts of observations have long known that some of the other terms (non-QG) are individually comparable to terms kept in quasigeostrophy. While the non-QG terms are not small, they are assumed to have a large degree of cancellation and so are still neglected in sum. The distributions, magnitudes, and possible cancellations of vorticity equation terms are examined. Analyzed data composites for 15 cases of mature, developing, extratropical cyclones are used. These results lead us to conclude that several commonly neglected terms are neither especially small nor do they cancel. The way each term contributes to the redistribution, advection, of amplification of vorticity is discussed. In sum, cyclone growth is greater at all levels, especially at low levels, in the full set of terms compared to the QG terms.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Grotjahn, Richard | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:11:07Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:11:07Z | |
date copyright | 1996/12/01 | |
date issued | 1996 | |
identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
identifier other | ams-62831.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4203766 | |
description abstract | All terms of the frictionless, nonlinear, vorticity equation are examined. Traditional scale analysis provides one of several justifications for using the quasigeostrophic (QG) system of equations to model extratropical cyclones. Analysts of observations have long known that some of the other terms (non-QG) are individually comparable to terms kept in quasigeostrophy. While the non-QG terms are not small, they are assumed to have a large degree of cancellation and so are still neglected in sum. The distributions, magnitudes, and possible cancellations of vorticity equation terms are examined. Analyzed data composites for 15 cases of mature, developing, extratropical cyclones are used. These results lead us to conclude that several commonly neglected terms are neither especially small nor do they cancel. The way each term contributes to the redistribution, advection, of amplification of vorticity is discussed. In sum, cyclone growth is greater at all levels, especially at low levels, in the full set of terms compared to the QG terms. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Vorticity Equation Terms for Extratropical Cyclones | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 124 | |
journal issue | 12 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2843:VETFEC>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 2843 | |
journal lastpage | 2858 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;1996:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 012 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |