YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Spatially Averaged Eulerian and Semi-Lagrangian Treatments of Mountains

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1996:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 001::page 167
    Author:
    Ritchie, Harold
    ,
    Tanguay, Monique
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<0167:ACOSAE>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: It has been demonstrated previously by both analysis and numerical integration that there is a serious problem incorporating orographic forcing into semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian models, since spurious resonance can develop in mountainous regions for Courant numbers larger than unity. Rivest et al. recommended using a second-order instead of a first-order semi-implicit off-centering to eliminate the spurious resonances, the former being more accurate. The present study shows by a linear one-dimensional analysis that a first-order semi-implicit off-centering can be used more effectively to eliminate the spurious resonances when combined with a spatially averaged Eulerian instead of a semi-Lagrangian treatment of mountains. The analysis reveals that the resonance is much less severe with the spatially averaged Eulerian treatment of mountains and, hence, can be suppressed with a weaker first-order off-centering. This combination could represent a valid alternative to second-order off-centering that needs extra time levels. The study also reveals that a serious truncation error is present in the neighborhood of the twin resonances when a semi-Lagrangian treatment of mountains is used. With the spatially averaged Eulerian treatment of the mountains the numerical solution filters the corresponding waves. These various points are illustrated with both barotropic and baroclinic semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian spectral models. An important feature of the baroclinic model formulation is the inclusion of topography in the basic-state solution that is used for the semi-implicit treatment of the gravity-wave-producing terms. In tests run from real data it appears that, in current three-time-level models, simply changing from the semi-Lagrangian to the spatially averaged Eulerian treatment of mountains is sufficient to significantly reduce the topographic resonance problem, permitting the use of larger time steps that produce acceptable time truncation errors without provoking the fictitious numerical amplification of short-scale waves.
    • Download: (1.338Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Spatially Averaged Eulerian and Semi-Lagrangian Treatments of Mountains

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4203580
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRitchie, Harold
    contributor authorTanguay, Monique
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:10:38Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:10:38Z
    date copyright1996/01/01
    date issued1996
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-62663.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4203580
    description abstractIt has been demonstrated previously by both analysis and numerical integration that there is a serious problem incorporating orographic forcing into semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian models, since spurious resonance can develop in mountainous regions for Courant numbers larger than unity. Rivest et al. recommended using a second-order instead of a first-order semi-implicit off-centering to eliminate the spurious resonances, the former being more accurate. The present study shows by a linear one-dimensional analysis that a first-order semi-implicit off-centering can be used more effectively to eliminate the spurious resonances when combined with a spatially averaged Eulerian instead of a semi-Lagrangian treatment of mountains. The analysis reveals that the resonance is much less severe with the spatially averaged Eulerian treatment of mountains and, hence, can be suppressed with a weaker first-order off-centering. This combination could represent a valid alternative to second-order off-centering that needs extra time levels. The study also reveals that a serious truncation error is present in the neighborhood of the twin resonances when a semi-Lagrangian treatment of mountains is used. With the spatially averaged Eulerian treatment of the mountains the numerical solution filters the corresponding waves. These various points are illustrated with both barotropic and baroclinic semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian spectral models. An important feature of the baroclinic model formulation is the inclusion of topography in the basic-state solution that is used for the semi-implicit treatment of the gravity-wave-producing terms. In tests run from real data it appears that, in current three-time-level models, simply changing from the semi-Lagrangian to the spatially averaged Eulerian treatment of mountains is sufficient to significantly reduce the topographic resonance problem, permitting the use of larger time steps that produce acceptable time truncation errors without provoking the fictitious numerical amplification of short-scale waves.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Comparison of Spatially Averaged Eulerian and Semi-Lagrangian Treatments of Mountains
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume124
    journal issue1
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<0167:ACOSAE>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage167
    journal lastpage181
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1996:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian