YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Observations and Scale Analysis of Coastal Wind Jets

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1995:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 010::page 2934
    Author:
    Overland, James E.
    ,
    Bond, Nicholas A.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<2934:OASAOC>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Blocking of onshore flow by coastal mountains was observed south of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, by the NOAA P-3 aircraft on 1 December 1993. Winds increased from 10 m s?1 offshore to 15 m s?1 nearshore and became more parallel to shore in the blocked region, which had a vertical scale of 500 m and an offshore scale of 40?50 km. These length scale and velocity increases are comparable to theory. The flow was semigeostrophic with the coast being hydrodynamically steep; that is, the coast acts like a wall and the alongshore momentum balance is ageostrophic. This is shown by the nondimensional slope parameter?the Burger number, B = hmN/fLm?being greater than 1, where hm and Lm are the height and half-width of the mountain, N is the stability frequency, and f is the Coriolis parameter. The height scale is given by setting the local Froude number equal to 1?that is, hl = U/N ? 500 m, where U is the onshore component of velocity. This scale is appropriate when hl is less than the mountain height, hm; in this case hl/hm ? 0.4. The offshore scale is given by the Rossby radius LR = (Nhm/f)Fm = U/f ? 50 km for Fm < 1, where the mountain Froude number Fm = hl/hm = U/hmN ? 0.4. The increase in the alongshore wind speed due to blocking, &DeltaV, is equal to the onshore component of the flow, U ≈ 6 m s?1 or in this case about half of the near-coastal alongshore component. A second case on 11 December 1993 had stronger onshore winds and weak stratification and was in a different hydrodynamic regime, with Fm ? 6. When Fm > 1, LR = Nhm/f ? 200 km, and ?V = hmN ? 2 m s?1, a small effect comparable to changes in the synoptic-scale flow. The authors expect a maximum coastal jet response when Fm ? 1.
    • Download: (787.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Observations and Scale Analysis of Coastal Wind Jets

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4203516
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorOverland, James E.
    contributor authorBond, Nicholas A.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:10:29Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:10:29Z
    date copyright1995/10/01
    date issued1995
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-62605.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4203516
    description abstractBlocking of onshore flow by coastal mountains was observed south of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, by the NOAA P-3 aircraft on 1 December 1993. Winds increased from 10 m s?1 offshore to 15 m s?1 nearshore and became more parallel to shore in the blocked region, which had a vertical scale of 500 m and an offshore scale of 40?50 km. These length scale and velocity increases are comparable to theory. The flow was semigeostrophic with the coast being hydrodynamically steep; that is, the coast acts like a wall and the alongshore momentum balance is ageostrophic. This is shown by the nondimensional slope parameter?the Burger number, B = hmN/fLm?being greater than 1, where hm and Lm are the height and half-width of the mountain, N is the stability frequency, and f is the Coriolis parameter. The height scale is given by setting the local Froude number equal to 1?that is, hl = U/N ? 500 m, where U is the onshore component of velocity. This scale is appropriate when hl is less than the mountain height, hm; in this case hl/hm ? 0.4. The offshore scale is given by the Rossby radius LR = (Nhm/f)Fm = U/f ? 50 km for Fm < 1, where the mountain Froude number Fm = hl/hm = U/hmN ? 0.4. The increase in the alongshore wind speed due to blocking, &DeltaV, is equal to the onshore component of the flow, U ≈ 6 m s?1 or in this case about half of the near-coastal alongshore component. A second case on 11 December 1993 had stronger onshore winds and weak stratification and was in a different hydrodynamic regime, with Fm ? 6. When Fm > 1, LR = Nhm/f ? 200 km, and ?V = hmN ? 2 m s?1, a small effect comparable to changes in the synoptic-scale flow. The authors expect a maximum coastal jet response when Fm ? 1.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleObservations and Scale Analysis of Coastal Wind Jets
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume123
    journal issue10
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<2934:OASAOC>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2934
    journal lastpage2941
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1995:;volume( 123 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian